Asp Forum - No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it - microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.remoting

=?Utf-8?B?cm9kY2hhcg==?=

7/14/2004 8:58:00 PM

I am getting following error on a remote service hosted
as windows service.
No connection could be made because the target machine
actively refused it
In services it show the service is running, I chaecked
all settings and IP address, port etc all is correct.
This was working before and now suddenly stopped working.
I have Win XP Professional m/c with framework 1.1, vs.net
2003

4 Answers

David J. Littleboy

12/30/2009 3:19:00 AM

"Michael Tueller" <mtuellerUSE@gmx.net> wrote:
>> To collect that energy requires covering a large
>> area with solar panels, which are not free. When the sun isnt shining,
>> you
>> must have stored energy, so that means you need some sort of storage
>> devices...which are inefficient and expensive. And if there is no room
>> for
>> the solar panels close to the city, you need to transport the energy,
>> which
>> means more cost and transmission losses.
>
>
> I don't think that's true anymore, but I'm no expert.
> Watch i.e. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjwKI...
>
> I can't understand why we didn't invest in this kind of technology a log
> time ago. We face a lot of "lost years" IMHO, all that was already clear
> 20 years ago. Time to start, but wait: investors prefer to put more hot
> air into one of the financial bubbles;-)

The reason is a simple two words: Ronald Reagan. He killed the vast majority
of the energy research that the Carter administration had been pushing.

http://liberallucidity.blogspot.com/2007/02/carter-and-reagan-on-en...

"But Ronald Reagan, with his "morning in America" mantra, won the election.
His administration soon began killing off many of Carter's energy
initiatives.

Reagan halved the Energy Department's conservation and alternative fuels
budget, according to Hakes. Spending on photovoltaic research dropped by
two-thirds. Yet tax breaks for ethanol actually increased, prompting a surge
in ethanol plant production.

Reagan's anti-tax, anti-government credo kicked into high gear during his
second term. Energy tax credits for homeowners disappeared. With oil prices
dropping, more than half of the nation's ethanol producers foundered."

The short-sightedness, and abject stupidity, of the Republicans is beyond
unbelievable.

--
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan

Steve

12/30/2009 2:54:00 PM

On 29-Dec-2009, "Michael Tueller" <mtuellerUSE@gmx.net> wrote:

> I don't think that's true anymore, but I'm no expert.
> Watch i.e. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjwKI...
>
> I can't understand why we didn't invest in this kind of technology a log
> time ago. We face a lot of "lost years" IMHO, all that was already clear
> 20 years ago. Time to start, but wait: investors prefer to put more hot
> air into one of the financial bubbles;-)

Thermal solar is subject to the same basic limitations as active solar, i.e.
the amount of energy that reaches the surface, storage for the many hours
when the sun isnt shining (night, cloudy or rainy days), land use, and
transmission. Thermal solar just replaces the photovoltaics with mirrors
and heated liquid, which must then be converted to electricity. In either
case, you would have to cover half of connecticutt to power NYC. Thermal
solar is good for heating the pool, but not practical for mass production of
electricity.

No matter how you convert sunlight to electricity, the power comes down
dispersed over a wide area and, for that insurmountable reason alone, is
expensive to collect. This is why I believe the market has never gone deep
into solar without govt subsidy. The promise of success is simply not
there, so why spend billions that you will never get back?

steve
--
"I've got a bomb in me pants!"
Wallace - A Matter of Loaf and Death

Joe Finn

12/30/2009 5:41:00 PM

"335" <335player@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:170ad288-aaae-4bda-a423-8ed37f4bd160@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 29, 11:13 am, "Joe Finn" <J...@JoeFinn.net> wrote:
> "andy-uk" <andy.uk.j...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7b4b0562-2de5-41b4-8536-dd2753b6e362@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >As you also know global warming is produced due to CO2 emissions
> >>coming from burning of fossil fuels. So what
> >>can every single person do to reduce global warming ?
>
> > 1) The proof of "the warming" is based on weather records that are
> > only 100 years old.
>
> > 2) The age of the earth is 4.5 billion years old.
>
> > 3) What about the 3 ice ages.... did we do them too?
>
> > how about the possiblility that its due to the suns fluctuations....
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/...
>
> Nice post. Unfortunately the global warming phenomenon has been co-opted
> by
> the media to the extent that concern and reason have given way to
> increasing
> levels of hysteria. You can pretty much forget about controlling CO2
> emissions, too. The emerging economies in China and India will be bringing
> great numbers of coal fired power plants online in the coming decade. They
> will all be driving automobiles at some point as well. These people
> rightly
> want the same things we have in the USA: a house that's warm in the winter
> and cool in the summer with all the major appliances and two cars in the
> driveway. ....joe
>
> --
> Visit me on the web www.JoeFinn.net
>
>
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

>>well, they have tried to use the tree ring data to estimate climate
>>fluctuations, and that data goes back a lot more than 100 years.
>>There's a lot of controversy about the tree data but alot of people
>>who study this believe there is some merit to it. As far as China is
>>concerned, the future is now. Based on one report I read, more
>>automobiles were sold there this year than in the US.

That's just the beginning. As far as China is concerned they are just
getting started down the road towards industrialization. They will be the
largest economy in the world before long. They have great coal reserves and
that is a natural resource that they will develop to the fullest. If I
remember correctly, I believe they are producing more concrete than anywhere
else in the world right now too.

I was also interested in your earlier point regarding the "agenda" of the
Cato Institute. While they certainly have a particular bias it is important
to bear in mind that there is a broad and strident agenda on the left as
well. Much of the media is complicit in this regard and the resulting
hysteria has been anything but helpful. Let's hope cooler heads prevail at
some point. ...joe
--
Visit me on the web www.JoeFinn.net

Paul K

12/30/2009 11:30:00 PM

Joey Goldstein wrote:
> steve wrote:
>> On 30-Dec-2009, Joey Goldstein <nospam@nowhere.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I have yet to see a credible dissenter.
>>> The *consensus* within the scientific community is that we have a
>>> problem and that it is a man-made problem.
>>> Nobody who is credible within the scientific community disagrees with
>>> that.
>>
>> You arent aware of this, then:
>>
>> http://www.petitionpr...
>
> Hoax.

No, just another right-wing outfit.
Here's who's behind it

http://www...

Here's an analysis of the "survey"

http://www.skeptic.com/eskepti...

and a link to a look into the (lack of) qualifications of those who signed
the petition (the largest group being engineers, who tend to the right wing
in the US)

http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/one-more-petition-still-...
s/

and here's a list of the major climate change skeptics, including who funds
them

http://lippard.blogspot.com/2009/12/who-are-climate-change-ske...

Lots of oil company money, as expected.

Paul K

--
http://www.youtube.com/To...
http://www.soundclick.co...

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.remoting

No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it

=?Utf-8?B?cm9kY2hhcg==?=

David J. Littleboy

Steve

Joe Finn

Paul K

x Login to ForumsZone