John Wood
7/7/2004 8:03:00 PM
Ah I should have said binary serialization... XmlSerializer is very cool,
but unfortunately serializing /deserializing between a text representation
of the object is just gonna be too slow for my needs...
Thanks though.
--
John Wood
EMail: first name, dot, second name at priorganize.com
"Raghu" <Raghu@nospamzzzqcsi.com> wrote in message
news:eLxh1pFZEHA.3512@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Have you tried XmlSerializer object in .net framework? You don''t even need
> Serializable attribute and every thing is done with attributes.
>
> "John Wood" <spam@isannoying.com> wrote in message
> news:O5jhwiEZEHA.2432@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > Does anyone know of any tools / solutions to automatic serialization of
> > objects (like the [Serializable] attribute with no custom
implementation,
> > but *without* the versioning headaches) ?
> >
> > By versioning headaches, I''m specifically referring to the problem where
> > inserting or removing a member breaks the deserialization.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > John Wood
> > EMail: first name, dot, second name at priorganize.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>