[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Re: [ANN] Ruby/.NET bridge R3

Benjamin Schroeder

9/14/2003 5:02:00 PM


On Sunday, September 14, 2003, at 12:24 PM, gabriele renzi wrote:

> il Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:51:15 +0900, Benjamin Schroeder
> <benschroeder@acm.org> ha scritto::
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'd like to announce Release 3 of our Ruby/.NET bridge, which lets you
>> use Ruby and .NET objects together in your programs. (Releases 1 and
>> 2
>> were available on the RAA and RubyForge, but this is the first one
>> we're announcing widely.)
>
> it seem I posted a question about rubydotnet at the same time you were
> sending this message :)

Yes, good timing! ;)

>> John and I would love to hear any feedback or questions you have -
>> either on this list or by private mail. I hope you enjoy using the
>> bridge!
>
> one thing I'd love to see is a reflection api for the .net classes.
> It seem to me that the .net framework allows reflection at some
> degree, and having a DotNetType.dotNetMethods would be lovely..

Sure, I like that idea. I think that the bridge that Tim Sutherland
was working on had something similar, as does the WIN32OLE package for
using COM objects. It would be nice to add the things around it, like
:respond_to? and :kind_of?, as well.

> BTW, a wonderful work!

Thanks!

Ben Schroeder


2 Answers

Chris Reynolds

5/12/2007 11:19:00 AM

0

http://www.remotesoft.com/linker/...
dunno of anything else. the guy behind it is interviewed here
http://www.dotnetrocks.com/default.aspx?sh...

hths

"Jonathan Chambers" <JonathanChambers@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:300487AC-58C1-479D-B549-B400864C6B83@microsoft.com...
>I am educating, but it may take time. As for the VM image, this is not an
> option as the application is performance sensitive.
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan

Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]

5/14/2007 6:35:00 PM

0


"Vijay" <Vijay@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BE3B4ABC-715B-4456-B5B3-C34ECC246A48@microsoft.com...
> You could install .net framework on an VM image (Virtual Machine) and
> users
> could remotely login to this machine and use the app. By the way, if you
> compare .net security to windows security, it's pretty much clear which is
> more secure in the long run. If not a technical issue, this is probably a

I hope you mean that Windows security is more secure? Because no platform
is more secure than the blocks it is built on.

> matter of educating and training customers.
>
> HTH