Mikael Engdahl
8/21/2003 6:12:00 PM
Umpa Lumpa wrote:
> Is everything under the System namespace going to be "standard" and
> everything under the Microsoft namespace custom per MS specific and in
> general Vendor.* namespaces for vendor specific classes.
I think that''s the intention, yes.
> If WinForms etc planned to be part of this "standard" or will it be not
> very portable and therefore should belong under the Microsoft.* namespace?
The guys at Mono (an "effort to create an open source implementation of the
..NET Development Framework") has pondered this and come to the conclusion
that winforms is indeed portable, but will still provide another GUI API too.
--
Mikael Engdahl