Asp Forum - ÿþL - microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general

.._..

12/28/2013 4:32:00 PM

Beaucoup de femmes préfèrent les sacs à main sans conception impressionnante et le style ou <a href=http://www.bookyards.com/rss/christianlouboutinchaussures.html>... Louboutin Pas Cher</a> peut-être la structure, seulement grâce à la meilleure façon correctement, il fonctionne d'ailleurs.si vous voulez rien du tout certain de complètement différent, vous pouvez obtenir énorme quantités avec des sacs à main exclusifs au design raffiné et aussi sacs à main designer disponibles en ligne.la maison moderne "râteau" très minces produit extrêmement grâces pages web ainsi que des copies papier, serrant le plus récent hobenger sac de voyage hackyunaki sur leur poitrine et aussi éclatante énorme ! par rapport au tout bagage du jour, emballages élégants de types de luxe de marque sont un couple des sacs les plus uniques built.faddymallettes expressément avoir adolescentes remarquables handbags développement obtient les composantes en ce qui concerne la tendance populaire et aussi sophistication.meanwhile, wright park offre l'équitation et quelques autres petits sacs à main stalls.copy de souvenirs sont la préférence faisable plus efficace alors que vous pourriez obtenir exactement le même sac à main en ce qui concerne environ la moitié de la charge que beaucoup de voir qui apparaît dans afin d', il n'y a pas beaucoup d'écart.\r.
ahead de robustesse, une plus pourquoi <a href=http://www.aviationcv.com/sacslongch... Longchamp Cuir</a> vous devriez acheter des sacsserait le fait qu'ils peuvent être stablesen raison de cette offre vous fait porter la dotation d'une femelle normale , vous ne serez pas contenir ces types d'opportunités 'bourse bombé "mal à l'aise, qui habituellement influencer généralement peut-être sacs à main designer raisonnablement emballés fabriqués avec une quantité moindre de tissus plus durables par rapport aux contenus quesacs à main et sacs à main sont fabriqués à partir de a plus qui peuvent vous permettre près de jouer en utilisant le formulaire de sondage exclusif cette bourse-porteuse veut essayer de faire faisant usage de leur emballage. remplacement fourre-tout n'est pas aussi w fourre-tout remplacement n'est pas ainsi que le dévouement qui est disponible sur le même pas si les prix. sacs à main et sacs à main sont plus vraiment compris également mis en place partout dans le monde, principalement parce que les composants de qualité supérieure extrêmement élevée, aspect , haute estime et si haut end.therefore, vous vous rendrez compte ce que les styles ont tendance à être de taille et même souhaitable pour la majorité des familles. Via l'analyse d'un grand nombre de ces examens, vous aurez certainement observer que l'un des nombreux attributs de qualité supérieure qui provoque cette notamment la spéciale suivante est certainement le tissu de tissu femmes used.most dans le monde devaient vêtement un peu comme votre fille.
Modèles doing sont parfois également <a href=http://www.quatrebis.fr/quatrebis/sacslongchamp.php&... Longchamp</a> besoin d'une diligence beaucoup.par exemple, les vendeurs doivent prendre connaissance de la substance réelle correctement pour obtenir juste autant de données détaillées comme c'est pratique afin de reproduire les criminels en grande partie . En outre substances primes doivent être sélectionnés pour assurer le même oculaire apparence globale.

http://fussballschule.thomasheidmann.biz/?q...
http://stonegames.se/index.php?topic=497...
http://gireviki.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&am...
http://www.turkwarez.biz/showthread.php?4109-ebwvlmk&p=87189&posted=1...
http://www.canuckabroad.com/forums/getting-paid-without-a-ssn-vt10126-470.h...

9 Answers

treg

12/5/2007 8:17:00 AM

Did anyone already receive and test this hotfix ?

I also noticed the kb944099 is talking about version 2.0.50727.948 of
system.data.dll
Today I received Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 on Windows update, this
Service pack contains version 2.0.50727.1433 of system.dat.dll and is
superseding KB928365. So this sould also fix this problem.

Anyone already tried 1 of this solutions ?

Kind regrards
Tom

"Mark" wrote:

> Looks like MS issued a hot fix for this on the 9th.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com...
>
>
> "Carlos Mendon??a" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I work at a Hosting Company in Brazil and we have been experiencing issues
> > with managed applications using .NET Framework 2.0 that connect to SQL
> > Server 2005 databases with a failover partner. These issues started
> > happening after we have applied KB928365
> > (http://support.microsoft.com...).
> >
> > The issue is an System.InvalidOperationException that is thrown every once
> > in a while when connecting to the databases. The message is 'Internal .Net
> > Framework Data Provider error 6.'. Both Operating System (Windows 2003) and
> > databases (SQL Server 2005) are up to date, including all Security Updates
> > and Service Packs.
> >
> > Although not many use failover partners to be able to reproduce the issue,
> > we have identified people with similar problems while searching for the
> > exception message in the major search engines. Additionally, the same
> > problem has been reported at 'microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.adonet', but
> > it has been suggested that KB928365 should be removed, which is not an
> > option for us considering the security concerns involved.
> >
> > I am posting in the newsgroups in hope of reaching someone from the .NET
> > team to report this issue. I think it may be a bug, but it could also be
> > some configuration requirement that KB928365 introduced. In either case, it
> > is an issue that affect big databases and I believe that we should pay
> > special attention to the case.
> >
> > I am not familiar with the process of reporting an issue to the .NET and/or
> > SQL Server teams and I would appreciate if someone could give me a hint.
> >
> > I thank you in advance.
> >
> > Carlos Mendon??a
> >
> >
> >

Carlos Mendon?a

12/21/2007 9:06:00 PM

We did and we confirm it does work. MS indeed solved the problem.

Regards,

Carlos Mendon?a

"treg" <treg@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:61E93D99-B384-43CB-BCD2-1BF49895AD1D@microsoft.com...
> Did anyone already receive and test this hotfix ?
>
> I also noticed the kb944099 is talking about version 2.0.50727.948 of
> system.data.dll
> Today I received Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 on Windows update, this
> Service pack contains version 2.0.50727.1433 of system.dat.dll and is
> superseding KB928365. So this sould also fix this problem.
>
> Anyone already tried 1 of this solutions ?
>
> Kind regrards
> Tom
>
>
>
> "Mark" wrote:
>
> > Looks like MS issued a hot fix for this on the 9th.
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com...
> >
> >
> > "Carlos Mendon?a" wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I work at a Hosting Company in Brazil and we have been experiencing
issues
> > > with managed applications using .NET Framework 2.0 that connect to SQL
> > > Server 2005 databases with a failover partner. These issues started
> > > happening after we have applied KB928365
> > > (http://support.microsoft.com...).
> > >
> > > The issue is an System.InvalidOperationException that is thrown every
once
> > > in a while when connecting to the databases. The message is 'Internal
..Net
> > > Framework Data Provider error 6.'. Both Operating System (Windows
2003) and
> > > databases (SQL Server 2005) are up to date, including all Security
Updates
> > > and Service Packs.
> > >
> > > Although not many use failover partners to be able to reproduce the
issue,
> > > we have identified people with similar problems while searching for
the
> > > exception message in the major search engines. Additionally, the same
> > > problem has been reported at
'microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.adonet', but
> > > it has been suggested that KB928365 should be removed, which is not an
> > > option for us considering the security concerns involved.
> > >
> > > I am posting in the newsgroups in hope of reaching someone from the
..NET
> > > team to report this issue. I think it may be a bug, but it could also
be
> > > some configuration requirement that KB928365 introduced. In either
case, it
> > > is an issue that affect big databases and I believe that we should pay
> > > special attention to the case.
> > >
> > > I am not familiar with the process of reporting an issue to the .NET
and/or
> > > SQL Server teams and I would appreciate if someone could give me a
hint.
> > >
> > > I thank you in advance.
> > >
> > > Carlos Mendon?a
> > >
> > >
> > >

David Brazier

3/6/2008 12:05:00 AM

We are still seeing this intermittently. The web server reporting the error,
along with the live and mirror database servers, all have .NET 2.0 SP1,
System.Data.dll version 2.0.507272.1433. KB944099 talks of a hotfix version
2.0.507272.948 and I would assume that SP1 includes this fix, but it appears
not to have fixed the problem in our case.

Any suggestions?

Val

3/27/2008 6:51:00 PM

We are seeing this problem almost once or twice per hour. We also have SP1
and of course could not install the hot fix as it fixes pre-SP1 code. Can
someone from MS please advise. We need a solution.

Thank you
Val

Chris Wood

4/2/2008 2:07:00 PM

David,

What was the hotfix? Was it 928365?

Thanks

Chris

"David Brazier" <DavidBrazier@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D9DF446F-68FF-47D3-8AC5-6A08548036BF@microsoft.com...
> We raised this with MS PSS. They confirmed it was not fixed in SP1 and
> they
> gave us the hotfix, which appears to have fixed it.

David Brazier

4/2/2008 8:38:00 PM

It was the hotfix described in KB 944099.

http://support.microsoft.com...

"Chris Wood" wrote:
> What was the hotfix? Was it 928365?

Chris Wood

4/3/2008 2:21:00 PM

David,

SO MS provided the fix when you reported the problem. Maybe they have a post
SP1 version and have not updated the KB article.

Chris

"David Brazier" <DavidBrazier@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8AB78D88-26DD-4449-9815-E21C67866662@microsoft.com...
> Our System.Data.dll is now version 2.0.50727.1813 after the hotfix.
> Looking
> at the KB article again, I see that says the fixed version is
> 2.0.50727.948.
> But that was pre-SP1 and I am guessing that they had to apply a new fix
> post-SP1, as it didn't make it into SP1 itself.
>
> "Chris Wood" wrote:
>
>> So David what is the new version of this DLL? 948 or 1433?
>

David Brazier

4/3/2008 2:37:00 PM

Yes, we reported it to MS support & they provided the hotfix. You're right,
the KB article should have been updated or replaced post-SP1.

"Chris Wood" wrote:
> SO MS provided the fix when you reported the problem. Maybe they have a post
> SP1 version and have not updated the KB article.

Jojo1771

4/15/2008 4:05:00 PM

http://support.microsoft.com...

microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general

ÿþL

.._..

treg

Carlos Mendon?a

David Brazier

Val

Chris Wood

David Brazier

Chris Wood

David Brazier

Jojo1771

x Login to ForumsZone