xenu1130@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 3, 12:01 pm, phil scott <p...@philscott.net> wrote:
>> On Apr 3, 11:25 am, dir...@1me.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 3, 5:18 am, xenu1...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Scientology is a criminal org! There is not doubt! CO$ abuses human
>>>> rights. They abuse the rights of those suffering addiction through
>>>> their Narconon program. COS abuses its members through life long
>>>> contracts through Sea Org....COS abuses the trust of just about
>>>> everyone and the IRS !!!! ...and of course Mr. Cruise is a nut!
>>>> However, Enturbubulation.org came along years after Arnie L. /
>>>> XenuTV / and others too, like the Lisa M Foundation.....
>>>> I applaud all of them, including Enturb.org - but do not lump them all
>>>> into one group so quick.
>>>> Enturbulation.org has become an excellent source for information, fact
>>>> checking, and a central meeting point for the collective, but Enturb
>>>> is lacking, in allowing the mainstream to join their cause.
>>>> What is the Mainstream you ask? To me, it's everyone, my children, my
>>>> grandma and grandpa, and anyone from Democrats to Republicans, it's
>>>> also those THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN ON THE INTERNET BEFORE, NEVER BEEN TO
>>>> ARS, NEVER BEEN TO AN INTERNET FORUM.......
>>>> There are many, many people without "any internet experience" that
>>>> want to help......
>>>> Some of those people may be as old as 40/ 50 / 60 / 70 years
>>>> old.......who knows?
>>>> Yet, most of the people at Enturb can't realize that this age group
>>>> have many powers, connections, and insights to the TERRIBLE CO$.
>>>> Either a parallel "Board" should be made for the older types, or
>>>> Enturb "youth" needs to lighten up....
>>>> This post was made in the true faith of bringing down the "false
>>>> reality" of CO$.......
>>>> I hope this is well received.........I hope Enturb.org one day
>>>> understands that they need to interact with my Grandma, as well as
>>>> their college buddy.......after all, WE ARE ALL ANONYMOUS!!!
>>> It isn't the communication so much as the argument about communication
>>> that is a problem, it is a distraction which is what the
>>> scientologists would want, us distracted.
>>> I believe some of the scientologist plants on *all* our forums are not
>>> so obvious, some are quite devious. They pretend to agree with
>>> everything but in the middle seed a negative. I saw one recently on
>>> enturbulation that said he felt anonymous was "still an Internet hate
>>> machine, just that it had refocused its hate" in the middle of some
>>> quite believable rant against scientology. I was going to respond but
>>> then I thought no, "Subtle troll is subtle". Translation: could be a
>>> scientologist plant, might not be one, might just be a jerk, can't say
>>> for sure so best leave it be because the argument serves their purpose
>>> regardless.
>>> As for communication some does fly over my head, perhaps because I am
>>> 45+ years old but I can live with it. There are however several sites
>>> and forums now, with a range of styles catering to a wide range of
>>> audiences and all it needs is a bit of cross posting which appears to
>>> happen anyway. So ok, enturbulation is not for you, well stay in ARS
>>> and read the feed and others will read ARS and feed back to
>>> enturbulation.
>>> The fact is that aside from the scientologists who sign up to all our
>>> forums with fake accounts and try to throw us off course, we all
>>> basically want the same thing. We do what we can in our way and if we
>>> can help out others in our group we do so; the more people we have the
>>> more resources and the more chance of people being able to help. There
>>> can be no doubt about it the anonymous phenomenon has been one hell of
>>> a shot in the arm; to be honest I was on the sidelines lurking around
>>> xenu.net for more than a year, I think a lot were, and it was only
>>> after the Feb 10th that I came on board properly. (Goodness knows I
>>> didn't expect the Feb 10th protests to pan out but they did).
>>> We all have to try and understand each other but I believe us older
>>> ones, with more experience, should make more of an effort to
>>> understand our offspring; they are after all "just kids" :-) Tolerance
>>> and understanding - both ways -, and occasionally biting your lip,
>>> that's how it gets done.
>>> As to those who have "NEVER BEEN ON THE INTERNET BEFORE", well someone
>>> is just going to have to speak to them; such things are simply not for
>>> everyone and it is a fools errand trying to make that so, not to
>>> mention a distraction to the true fight.
>>> Divisive argument is what the scientologists wants. This is not to be
>>> confused with discussion and debate, such as happens in enturbulation,
>>> when ideas are floated and are either sunk or lifted in to the air; it
>>> is often harsh but that is simply how it works with them y'ung uns.
>>> The scientologists plants only advantage will be knowing what is said
>>> unless we give them the advantage of letting them throw us of course
>>> by allowing them to foster true divisions.
>>> Now, I have another anti-scientology video to produce to help rally
>>> the folks on YouTube to the April 12th protest / raid so you will
>>> forgive me but I have said my piece on this; email me with counter
>>> arguements and I will ignore it because I am too busy fighting the
>>> good fight. :-)
>>> cya folks.- Hide quoted text -
>>> - Show quoted text -
>> well said bud.
>>
>> Phil scott- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I received this email from someone that came through a proxy webiste
> service in Austria.....This is the kind of thing that makes me sad....
>
>
>
>
> "God...
>
> You don't even have to put your name in your whiny little faggot posts
> on ARS. Clearly, you are the same retard that went by XXXX on Enturb.
>
> It's funny. You put up one stupid post after another, and when
> (clearly) it doesn't gain popular support -- you cry like a fucking
> baby
> instead of just moving on to a new idea.
>
> And after you've done this a dozen times or so, your posts mainly wind
> up in THUNDERDOME... where they belong... and you cry some more. Wah
> wah wah wah wah.
>
> Do you learn?
>
> Fuck no.
>
> YOU RUN OVER TO A.R.S. AND OCMB TO CRY SOME MORE ABOUT THE SAME SHIT.
>
> You are clearly one of the dumbest motherfuckers I've ever seen on the
> Internet.
>
> I'm 52... have no problem whatsoever "understanding" Enturb, its
> language and its culture.
>
> If you think there needs to be an "old folks" site -- shut your
> fucking
> whiny bitch hole AND MAKE ONE YOURSELF. Quit spreading your faggotry
> all over the place. Have you noticed nobody gives a fuck yet?
>
> 95% of what you do is bitching about what you think other people
> should
> do... or bitching about how nobody takes your ideas seriously. Do you
> know why that is? It's because the 5% of the time you spend coming up
> with "new" ideas instead of bitching, THE IDEAS SUCK.
>
> You had one successful thread on Enturb -- and that was because you
> cut-and-pasted some info there you FOUND here on ARS... then a LOT OF
> OTHER PEOPLE DID A LOT OF HARD WORK. And you had the fucking nerve to
> cite THEIR work as an example of YOUR validity? You didn't contribute
> jack-shit to that thread except for the 5 seconds it took you to
> cut-and-paste. Wow. Big contribution.
>
> Fuck you. We don't need whimpering bitches in this fight. "
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I just don't see a 52 year old person with this much
> anger........WoW!!!
OMG...you're not that moron 'anonymatt' who ran snivelling to ent about
how we were beating you up here for your stupid ideas, are you?
--
Barb
Chaplain, ARSCC (wdne)
It's Poodlin' Time!
?I think that the protections that we enjoy for freedom of worship exist
so long as we don?t step over the line. When religious worship and
belief cross over into things like fraud, victimization of others and
the disruption of the political arena, that protection is no longer
appropriate.?
--Robert Goff
Professor Emeritus, UCSC