tirebiter
2/7/2013 3:03:00 PM
Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote in news:Jason-0602132212570001@67-150-123-
14.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com:
> In article <XnsA15FD66CCC8A6nomailverizonnet@216.196.121.131>, Mitchell
> Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote in
>> news:Jason-0602131755080001@67-150-124-214.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com:
>>
>> > In article <hlwdjsd2-C33347.17292806022013@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>> > Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article
>> >> <Jason-0602131546090001@66-53-214-111.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
>> >> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>> >> > > Are you too lazy to understand the term "military grade
>> >> > > weaponry"?
>> >> >
>> >> > That is why I asked you what weapons you are referring to?
>> >> >
>> >> > For example--If you were referring to civilians owning a F-16
>> >> > fighter jet? the answer is NO
>> >>
>> >> Why not?
>> >
>> > Because they are not needed.
>>
>>
>> Ditto for AR 15s
>
> I believe we do need them in case America is invaded.
>
>
>
And so far your list of reasons to justify assault weapons is:
1. Defend against an unknown invasion from an unknown enemy for unknown
reasons.
2. <end of list>
That isn't good enough for the real item 1 on that list, which is:
1. It's the weapon of choice for mass murderers.
---
a.a. #2273