[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion

Opening PDF with zoom

avi

2/10/2012 11:08:00 AM

Hello,

I'm using ShellExecute 0, "open", myDirectory & "EzPaste.pdf", "", "",
1

It works fine but I want to be able to control the zoom regardless the
preferences the end user has set in Acrobate

Avi
24 Answers

J. Sidney \"Insane\" McCain

6/18/2008 8:33:00 PM

0

Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>
> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org>
> wrote:
>> in a US Court of law.
>>
>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
>> Capture
>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>> February 10, 2008
>>
>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>
>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>
>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
>> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
>> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
>> proven guilty
>
> And so he should.
>
> What's the problem with that?
> ==========
>
> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama Bin
> Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?

When did he do that? Please cite.

>
> Liberals twist their crack riddled brains in a knot trying to spin
> their way out of this question.

Was it paint chips? Or did your mom drop you on your head one too many
times.

Today's News

6/18/2008 8:34:00 PM

0


"Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org> wrote in message
news:-JWdnYjLTrUR8MTVnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@comcast.com...
> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama Bin
> Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>
> Liberals twist their crack riddled brains in a knot trying to spin their
> way out of this question.

WOW! You sure are dumb.


z

6/18/2008 8:36:00 PM

0

"Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org> wrote in
news:-JWdnYjLTrUR8MTVnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@comcast.com:

>
> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com.
> .. On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org>
> wrote:
>> in a US Court of law.
>>
>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
>> Capture
>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>> February 10, 2008
>>
>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>
>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>
>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
>> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
>> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent
>> until proven guilty
>
> And so he should.
>
> What's the problem with that?
> ==========
>
> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama Bin
> Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?

Killed or captured, either way it'd be better than the fool Bush has done
sice 9/11.

>
> Liberals twist their crack riddled brains in a knot trying to spin
> their way out of this question.

Not just Liberals believe in the constitution and rule of law.

>
>

Enviromentally Whacko

6/18/2008 8:39:00 PM

0


"J. Sidney "Insane" McCain" <Sid@nuthouse.org> wrote in message
news:oie6k.90260$bs3.7814@trnddc07...
> Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>>
>> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
>> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org>
>> wrote:
>>> in a US Court of law.
>>>
>>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
>>> Capture
>>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>>> February 10, 2008
>>>
>>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>>
>>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>>
>>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
>>> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
>>> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
>>> proven guilty
>>
>> And so he should.
>>
>> What's the problem with that?
>> ==========
>>
>> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama Bin
>> Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>
> When did he do that? Please cite.
>
=============

YOu seem to have a reading problem. i already posted thsis once you stupid
inbred.

President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or Capture
Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
February 10, 2008

http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...





Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism



Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
proven guilty

Enviromentally Whacko

6/18/2008 8:39:00 PM

0


"Today's News" <rightwingers@gitmo.net> wrote in message
news:1je6k.8742$jI5.4974@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com...
>
> "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org> wrote in message
> news:-JWdnYjLTrUR8MTVnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama Bin
>> Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>>
>> Liberals twist their crack riddled brains in a knot trying to spin their
>> way out of this question.
>
> WOW! You sure are dumb.
>=============

I see you cant explain Obama's contradictory position either.
Here try again.

President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or Capture
Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
February 10, 2008

http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...





Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism



Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
proven guilty

Enviromentally Whacko

6/18/2008 8:40:00 PM

0


"z" <z@yada.yada> wrote in message
news:Xns9AC18A45359E7zyadayada@216.196.97.131...
> "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org> wrote in
> news:-JWdnYjLTrUR8MTVnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>>
>> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
>> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com.
>> .. On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org>
>> wrote:
>>> in a US Court of law.
>>>
>>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
>>> Capture
>>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>>> February 10, 2008
>>>
>>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>>
>>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>>
>>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
>>> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
>>> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent
>>> until proven guilty
>>
>> And so he should.
>>
>> What's the problem with that?
>> ==========
>>
>> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama Bin
>> Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>
> Killed or captured, either way it'd be better than the fool Bush has done
> sice 9/11.
>
>>
>> Liberals twist their crack riddled brains in a knot trying to spin
>> their way out of this question.
>
> Not just Liberals believe in the constitution and rule of law.
>
-=================

Tell us where in the US Constitution it says foreign terrorists are gifted
US Citizens rights?
You claim Foreign terrorists are US citizens i see.

George Grapman

6/18/2008 8:49:00 PM

0

Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>
> "J. Sidney "Insane" McCain" <Sid@nuthouse.org> wrote in message
> news:oie6k.90260$bs3.7814@trnddc07...
>> Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>>>
>>> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> in a US Court of law.
>>>>
>>>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
>>>> Capture
>>>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>>>> February 10, 2008
>>>>
>>>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>>>
>>>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>>>
>>>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
>>>> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
>>>> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
>>>> proven guilty
>>>
>>> And so he should.
>>>
>>> What's the problem with that?
>>> ==========
>>>
>>> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama
>>> Bin Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>>
>> When did he do that? Please cite.
>>
> =============
>
> YOu seem to have a reading problem. i already posted thsis once you
> stupid inbred.

Why are you obsessed with inbreeding,babs?
>
> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
> Capture Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
> February 10, 2008
>
> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>
>
>
>
>
> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>
>
>
> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
> proven guilty
>
>
>


And when you posted it you claimed it said something that was not there.

J. Sidney \"Insane\" McCain

6/18/2008 9:00:00 PM

0

Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>
> "J. Sidney "Insane" McCain" <Sid@nuthouse.org> wrote in message
> news:oie6k.90260$bs3.7814@trnddc07...
>> Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>>>
>>> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> in a US Court of law.
>>>>
>>>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
>>>> Capture
>>>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>>>> February 10, 2008
>>>>
>>>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>>>
>>>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>>>
>>>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
>>>> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
>>>> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
>>>> proven guilty
>>>
>>> And so he should.
>>>
>>> What's the problem with that?
>>> ==========
>>>
>>> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama
>>> Bin Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>>
>> When did he do that? Please cite.
>>
> =============
>
> YOu seem to have a reading problem. i already posted thsis once you
> stupid inbred.
>
> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^

Who's attacking whom here, Einstein? Are you retarded (don't answer,
it's obvious).

> Capture Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
> February 10, 2008

It is true though, Bush is a failure and bin Laden is still free.

>
> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...

This is too funny on so many levels. Did you actually *read* what you
just posted?!? Did you read *anything* on the page you linked to? Are
you a complete *moron* (don't answer, you just posted proof).

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

George Grapman

6/18/2008 9:30:00 PM

0

J. Sidney "Insane" McCain wrote:
> Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>>
>> "J. Sidney "Insane" McCain" <Sid@nuthouse.org> wrote in message
>> news:oie6k.90260$bs3.7814@trnddc07...
>>> Enviromentally Whacko wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> in a US Court of law.
>>>>>
>>>>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill
>>>>> Or Capture
>>>>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>>>>> February 10, 2008
>>>>>
>>>>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>>>>
>>>>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>>>>
>>>>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that terrorists
>>>>> captured by the US have a US constitutional right to challenge their
>>>>> indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and are innocent until
>>>>> proven guilty
>>>>
>>>> And so he should.
>>>>
>>>> What's the problem with that?
>>>> ==========
>>>>
>>>> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama
>>>> Bin Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>>>
>>> When did he do that? Please cite.
>>>
>> =============
>>
>> YOu seem to have a reading problem. i already posted thsis once you
>> stupid inbred.
>>
>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill Or
> ^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Who's attacking whom here, Einstein? Are you retarded (don't answer,
> it's obvious).
>
>> Capture Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>> February 10, 2008
>
> It is true though, Bush is a failure and bin Laden is still free.
>
>>
>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>
> This is too funny on so many levels. Did you actually *read* what you
> just posted?!? Did you read *anything* on the page you linked to? Are
> you a complete *moron* (don't answer, you just posted proof).
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
>
>
babs regularly posts links that have no relationship to her claims.

z

6/19/2008 12:14:00 AM

0

"Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org> wrote in
news:jfKdne87-bd978TVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@comcast.com:

>
> "z" <z@yada.yada> wrote in message
> news:Xns9AC18A45359E7zyadayada@216.196.97.131...
>> "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko @Democrap.org> wrote in
>> news:-JWdnYjLTrUR8MTVnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@comcast.com:
>>
>>>
>>> <zacks@construction-imaging.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e2319fd5-4b23-4f4e-9e08-c58b9f7f5098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.co
>>> m. .. On Jun 18, 3:58 pm, "Enviromentally Whacko" <whacko
>>> @Democrap.org> wrote:
>>>> in a US Court of law.
>>>>
>>>> President Bush Falsely Attacks Barack Obama After Failing To Kill
>>>> Or Capture
>>>> Osama Bin Laden For Over Seven Years
>>>> February 10, 2008
>>>>
>>>> http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/02/10/...
>>>>
>>>> Obama rebukes McCain camp on terrorism criticism
>>>>
>>>> Obama agreed with the Supreme Court ruling last week that
>>>> terrorists captured by the US have a US constitutional right to
>>>> challenge their indefinite imprisonment in U.S. civilian courts and
>>>> are innocent until proven guilty
>>>
>>> And so he should.
>>>
>>> What's the problem with that?
>>> ==========
>>>
>>> So why is Hussein Obama attacking Bush for not having Killed osama
>>> Bin Laden before hes been found guilty in a US court trial?
>>
>> Killed or captured, either way it'd be better than the fool Bush has
>> done sice 9/11.
>>
>>>
>>> Liberals twist their crack riddled brains in a knot trying to spin
>>> their way out of this question.
>>
>> Not just Liberals believe in the constitution and rule of law.
>>
> -=================
>
> Tell us where in the US Constitution it says foreign terrorists are
> gifted US Citizens rights?

They have the right to present evidence that they are not terrorists.
So says the court.

> You claim Foreign terrorists are US citizens i see.

You must be blind