mm
11/14/2011 12:48:00 AM
El 13/11/2011 09:06 p.m., ralph escribió:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:26:53 +1100, "blank"<blank@blankety.blank.com>
> wrote:
>
>> OT: It's not just Micro$oft who ignore their customers!
>>
>> I've just had Google's new search interface thrust on me. Dreadful. Will be
>> using another search engine after years of happy Googling!
>>
>> Anyone suggest a suitable Google ng to lodge my humble opinion?
>>
>
> Ha. There are several.
>
> Remember the big squawk a while ago when they went to 'larger' fonts
> in the search window? The reponse was over-whelmingly against it.
>
> You forget Google hires the best and brightest in the computing world.
> Google knows more about what is best for you than any other company
> out there. Now just shut-up and bend over.
>
> -ralph
Google is getting more and more stupid lately. It's like MS mandatory
ways to "help you" (for example not searching for files under certain
folders -but in this case you still have an advanced option, but I don't
trust, I use Agent Ransac instead-, or some other features "to help you").
Some days ago, I wanted to search for 'best ocr software for
handwriting' on Google. There was no way (at least that I figured out in
a simple search) to say Google that I want to search ICR, not OCR, but
anyway include the links where "OCR" appear.
Google consider OCR a synonymous of ICR, so for google it's the same.
If I search for 'best ocr software for handwriting -OCR' it will exclude
all the page where OCR appear, that are the most, and if I search 'best
ocr software for handwriting' it will treat the word OCR as it was ICR
and will show mostly pages about OCR (not ICR).
Really stupid.
I had to use yahoo.