Jeff
10/19/2011 6:04:00 PM
On Oct 19, 12:46 pm, moonpie <mr_rc_moon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:32:43 -0700 (PDT), "who?"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <yourimageunre...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >On Oct 19, 10:56 am, Fattuchus <fattuc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Oct 19, 10:49 am, Billy <billybartlet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Oct 19, 10:28 am, moonpie <mr_rc_moon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > >Didn't Yoko's output and public doings increase radically almost
> >> > > >immediately after.John was killed. It seems like she was coming out
> >> > > >with an album every year. How many albums did she put out before she
> >> > > >got John? Would anyone even consider her a singer (and a player of
> >> > > >whatever instrument she says she plays) without the Lennon
> >> > > >connection? I mean, who would actually believe it?
>
> >> > > Would anybody look at Pattie Harrisons photographs if not for her
> >> > > famous husband?
>
> >> > > No.
>
> >> > > So why arent all you Yoko bashers, ganging up on her, for doing the
> >> > > same thing (cashing in on her name association)
>
> >> > I don't know. I'm not familiar with them. It seems to me, and I
> >> > could be wrong, that Patti Harrison hasn't hogged the spotlight the
> >> > way Yoko has.
> >> > Did Patti ever join George onstage or in the studio? Did she claim
> >> > she sad famous before she met George? Did she tend to belittle
> >> > George?
> >> > It seems that Patti isn't the obnoxious news-whore poseur that Yoko
> >> > is. Your comparison strikes me as weak.
>
> >> Another excellent post.
>
> >I suppose It is if you consider someone putting someone down all the
> >time a good thing.
>
> Those two cant even see it as the same exact thing they're doing. They
> somehow justify it for Yoko, but when Patti does it on a much smaller
> scale, they're OK with it.
Yep, and they don't get that the remaining spouse is entitled to do
what they wish with their money, promoting them, promoting
themselves, re-packaging their music, etc etc.