James Coglan
6/10/2009 9:45:00 AM
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
2009/6/10 James Coglan <jcoglan@googlemail.com>
> Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage
> instead of a Set? Wouldn't a Set be faster, especially for removing
> observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data
> structures could be improved?
>
Gah, I was looking at the 1.8 lib. 1.9 uses a Hash. Sorry!