[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Nested HTTP params on ruby HTTP requests

Dave Garcia

6/4/2009 11:26:00 AM

Hi,

I'm using ruby HTTP classes to send POST requests to a server. The
problem is that I'm posting some many-levels hierarchical structures on
my form . When POST parameters are simple key/value there's no
serialization problem with form_data method on PostRequest.

{ :a => :b} => "a=b"

When the values are arrays it works fine too

{ :a => [:b,:c,:d]} => "a[]=b&a[]=c&a[]=d"

But when values are hashes serialization doesn't work as expected.

For example
{ :a => [{:b => :c}, {:d => :e}]} => "a[][b]=c&a[][d]=e"

I don't know if there's any other way to do it but browsing the code it
seems that only one nesting level is supported (maybe is an issue on my
ruby version 1.8.6).

I developed a tiny serialization method. Is a quick and dirty code (the
first release I've made) but it works for me.

module FormSerializer
require "erb"
include ERB::Util

def serialize_form_data(data, path = "",serialized_params = [])
if data.kind_of? Hash
data.each_pair{|k,v| token = (path == "" ? url_encode(k) :
"[#{url_encode(k)}]"); serialize_form_data(v, "#{path}#{token}",
serialized_params)}
elsif data.kind_of? Array
data.each{|v| serialize_form_data(v, "#{path}[]",
serialized_params) }
else
#end of recursion
serialized_params << "#{path}=#{url_encode(data)}"
end

return serialized_params.join("&") if (path == "")
end


#{ :a => :b} = "a=b"
#{ :a => [:b,:c,:d]} = "a[]=b&a[]=c&a[]=d"
#{ :a => :b, :b => :c} = "a=b&b=c"
#{ :a => {:b => :c}} = "a[b] = c"
#{ :a => [{:b => :c}, {:d => :e}]} = "a[][b] = c & a[][d] = e"


end

After this I only needed to modify

def form_data(params, sep = '&')
self.body = serialize_form_data(params)
self.content_type = 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'
end

I just finished the code some hours ago, basic testing has been
performed.
Hope this will be useful for anyone! :)

Best regards

Dave Garcia
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

5 Answers

Brian Candler

6/4/2009 2:12:00 PM

0

Dave Garcia wrote:
> { :a => :b} => "a=b"
>
> When the values are arrays it works fine too
>
> { :a => [:b,:c,:d]} => "a[]=b&a[]=c&a[]=d"
>
> But when values are hashes serialization doesn't work as expected.
>
> For example
> { :a => [{:b => :c}, {:d => :e}]} => "a[][b]=c&a[][d]=e"

Well, firstly, you didn't say what framework is parsing this form data.
But also, in this example you're doing mixtures of arrays and hashes,
and I don't think that's likely to work. (Of course, feel free to make a
patch for whatever framework you're using, and submit it)

I think you'll have more luck with hashes of hashes:

a[b][c]=d&a[b][d]=e

will probably be deserialised as {'a'=>{'b'=>{'c'=>'d','e'=>'f'}}}

At least, I'm reasonably sure Rails can handle this. Rack had some
issues with its parsing of nested form-data parameters which may or may
not have been fixed yet. And if you're using some other framework with
its own parameter parsing, then you'll need to look at that separately.

> I don't know if there's any other way to do it but browsing the code it
> seems that only one nesting level is supported (maybe is an issue on my
> ruby version 1.8.6).

It's unlikely to be anything to do with your ruby version, unless the
deserialisation is being done by some code which is bundled with ruby
(the CGI library??)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Brian Candler

6/4/2009 2:13:00 PM

0

Of course, I meant

a[b][c]=d&a[b][e]=f

will probably be deserialised as {'a'=>{'b'=>{'c'=>'d','e'=>'f'}}}
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Dave Garcia

6/4/2009 4:17:00 PM

0

Hi Brian,

On the client side:

params = {:a=>[{:d=>:e, :b=>:c}]}
serialize_form_data(params) # "a[][d]=e&a[][b]=c"

On the server side Rails 2.3.2 works fine deserializing my params are :

{"a"=>[{"b"=>"c", "d"=>"e"}], "action"=>"show",
"controller"=>"identities"}

Maybe you're right , I'll talk with the guys in RoR maybe they're
interested.

Best regards

Dave

Brian Candler wrote:
> Of course, I meant
>
> a[b][c]=d&a[b][e]=f
>
> will probably be deserialised as {'a'=>{'b'=>{'c'=>'d','e'=>'f'}}}

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Brian Candler

6/4/2009 7:46:00 PM

0

Dave Garcia wrote:
> On the client side:
>
> params = {:a=>[{:d=>:e, :b=>:c}]}
> serialize_form_data(params) # "a[][d]=e&a[][b]=c"
>
> On the server side Rails 2.3.2 works fine deserializing my params are :
>
> {"a"=>[{"b"=>"c", "d"=>"e"}], "action"=>"show",
> "controller"=>"identities"}

Then I've lost you, because that all seems to be working fine (both
serialize_form_data and RoR deserializing it)

So can you give an example of what the problem actually is?

> But when values are hashes serialization doesn't work as expected.
>
> For example
> { :a => [{:b => :c}, {:d => :e}]} => "a[][b]=c&a[][d]=e"

Maybe I misunderstood this. Is this what your code actually produces, or
what you expected it to produce? If not, what did you expect it to
produce?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Dave Garcia

6/5/2009 8:15:00 AM

0

Hi Brian,

you're not lost I explained myself terrible, my fault ;).

Those example of serializations are produced by my code. I tested it
only sending post request vs rails, but it worked fine with all proposed
examples.

Sorry for by bad explanation.

Best regards

Dave

Brian Candler wrote:
> Dave Garcia wrote:
>> On the client side:
>>
>> params = {:a=>[{:d=>:e, :b=>:c}]}
>> serialize_form_data(params) # "a[][d]=e&a[][b]=c"
>>
>> On the server side Rails 2.3.2 works fine deserializing my params are :
>>
>> {"a"=>[{"b"=>"c", "d"=>"e"}], "action"=>"show",
>> "controller"=>"identities"}
>
> Then I've lost you, because that all seems to be working fine (both
> serialize_form_data and RoR deserializing it)
>
> So can you give an example of what the problem actually is?
>
>> But when values are hashes serialization doesn't work as expected.
>>
>> For example
>> { :a => [{:b => :c}, {:d => :e}]} => "a[][b]=c&a[][d]=e"
>
> Maybe I misunderstood this. Is this what your code actually produces, or
> what you expected it to produce? If not, what did you expect it to
> produce?

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....