[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Intel Ships 1.66GHz Atom N280 Processor

whatnext@gmail.com

5/26/2009 6:45:00 AM

Intel may be placing its quad-core Itanium server chip back in the
oven, but it's having no issues whatsoever shipping the latest
iteration of its white-hot Atom CPU
for more info visit www.infoaboutintelprocessor.blogspot.com
8 Answers

Mulligan

2/16/2014 6:43:00 PM

0

On Sunday, February 16, 2014 1:30:05 PM UTC-5, John Manning wrote:


> Did you get that far right fringe nonsense from your fellow Mormon
> fraud, Glenn Beck?


What is he a fraud about?

hal lillywhite

2/16/2014 6:45:00 PM

0

On Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:30:05 AM UTC-8, John Manning wrote:

> True and some statists want to make it even worse by taking children away from their parents and having government raise them. Shades of Stalin, he tossed parents in the gulag for teaching their kids religion.

> You sound like an extremist crackpot, Hilly Whoo.

> Let's see you back up that claim.

http://www.infowars.com/your-kids-belong-to-the-c...


> AND, do you consider the people who wrote the following words
> to be 'statists' ?
>
>
>
> "We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more
> perfect Union, establish Justice,
> insure domestic Tranquility,
> provide for the common defence, promote the
> general Welfare,
> and
> secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
> do ordain and establish this Constitution
> for the United States
> of America."

Nothing there about destroying parental rights. That is a statement of rather nebulous goals, not specific measures.

John Manning

2/16/2014 7:48:00 PM

0

On 2/16/2014 3:45 PM, hlillywh@juno.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:30:05 AM UTC-8, John Manning wrote:
>
>> True and some statists want to make it even worse by taking children away from their parents and having government raise them. Shades of Stalin, he tossed parents in the gulag for teaching their kids religion.
>
>> You sound like an extremist crackpot, Hilly Whoo.
>
>> Let's see you back up that claim.
> http://www.infowars.com/your-kids-belong-to-the-c...

You're living up to your growing reputation as a bald-faced lying little
worm, Hilly Whoo.

I watched the video. *NOWHERE* did Mellisa Harris Perry advocate,
*nor did she claim that ANYONE ELSE****advocated* "taking children away
from their parents and having the government raise them."

Brigham Young was right about you Mormons:

"I have many a time, in this stand, dared the world to produce as mean
devils as we can;
we can beat them at anything. *We have the greatest and smoothest liars
in the world*,
*the cunningest and most adroit thieves, and any other shade of
character that you can
mention. **
*
"We can pick out Elders in Israel right here who can beat the world at
gambling, who can
handle the cards, cut and shuffle them with the smartest rogue on the
face of God's foot-stool.
I can produce Elders here who can shave their smartest shavers, and take
their money from
them. We can beat the world at any game."

~~ Mormon Prophet of God and Church President, Brigham Young,
in the Mormon Tabernacle, Salt Lake City, November 9, 1856


>> AND, do you consider the people who wrote the following words
>> to be 'statists' ?
>>
>>
>>
>> "We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more
>> perfect Union, establish Justice,
>> insure domestic Tranquility,
>> provide for the common defence, promote the
>> general Welfare,
>> and
>> secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
>> do ordain and establish this Constitution
>> for the United States
>> of America."
> Nothing there about destroying parental rights. That is a statement of rather nebulous goals, not specific measures.


Only an *out-of-touch-with-reality* fringe crackpot would suggest that
public education
*- which has been a COMMON STANDARD in the USA since the first American
colonies -*
equates with "taking children away from their parents and having
government raise them."

*AND,* only a *NOTORIOUS* fringe crackpot like Alex Jones, and gullible
dimwitted fools like you
who believe him, would draw that conclusion from Mellisa Harris Perry's
comments.

And you didn't answer my questions:

Do you consider the Government of the United States of America to be a
"statist" government ???

OR, are you simply living in your own little fantasy world of
self-serving word definitions that you've made up ?

Mulligan

2/16/2014 7:57:00 PM

0

On Sunday, February 16, 2014 2:48:15 PM UTC-5, John Manning wrote:


> "We can pick out Elders in Israel right here who can beat
> the world at gambling, who can
>
> handle the cards, cut and shuffle them with the smartest rogue on
> the face of God's foot-stool.
>
> I can produce Elders here who can shave their smartest shavers, and
> take their money from
>
> them. We can beat the world at any game."
>
>
>
> ~~ Mormon Prophet of God and Church President, Brigham Young,
>
> in the Mormon Tabernacle, Salt Lake City, November 9, 1856
>


wise as serpents, but harmless as doves ...

hal lillywhite

2/17/2014 1:46:00 AM

0

On Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:48:15 AM UTC-8, John Manning wrote:

> http://www.infowars.com/your-kids-belong-to-the-c...


> You're living up to your growing reputation as a bald-faced lying
> little worm, Hilly Whoo.

> I watched the video. NOWHERE did Mellisa Harris Perry
> advocate, nor did she claim that ANYONE ELSE advocated
> "taking children away from their parents and having the
> government raise them."

And just what do you think she means when she says that children belong to the collective, not to their parents?

Expecting another fancy dance as always happens when you get caught.

John Manning

2/17/2014 3:35:00 PM

0

On 2/16/2014 10:45 PM, hlillywh@juno.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:48:15 AM UTC-8, John Manning wrote:
>
>> http://www.infowars.com/your-kids-belong-to-the-c...
>
>> You're living up to your growing reputation as a bald-faced lying
>> little worm, Hilly Whoo.
>> I watched the video. NOWHERE did Mellisa Harris Perry
>> advocate, nor did she claim that ANYONE ELSE advocated
>> "taking children away from their parents and having the
>> government raise them."
> And just what do you think she means when she says that children belong to the collective, not to their parents?

It's not difficult to see that she was referring to children as being
not merely
the 'property' of their parents, but being an inseparable living part of
the community
as a whole - similarly as the founding fathers referred to the United
States of America
as "*We the People".*

Apparently you don't even understand the meaning of "*We the People".
*
Standardized*, *quality* *Public Education is what made the nation *
- *as a******diverse yet** WHOLE community* - *so great. *

*Try looking up the *meaning of the words* "E Pluribus Unum"on the
Seal of the United States of America, you mendacious halfwit.**
**
> Expecting another fancy dance as always happens when you get caught.

I repeat:

*NOWHERE* - as you**FALSELY CLAIMED** did Mellisa Harris Perry advocate,
nor did she claim that*ANYONE ELSE* advocated*"**taking children away from their**
**parents and having the government raise them**."*

You're apparently so buried in your paranoid fantasy world of lies that
you *don't even notice*
when you're lying.

hal lillywhite

2/18/2014 5:57:00 PM

0

On Monday, February 17, 2014 7:34:48 AM UTC-8, John Manning wrote:

> And just what do you think she means when she says that children belong to the collective, not to their parents?

> It's not difficult to see that she was referring to children as
> being not merely
> the 'property' of their parents, but being an inseparable living
> part of the community
> as a whole - similarly as the founding fathers referred to the
> United States of America
> as "We the People".

So you think the "community" will own the children but allow their parents to teach them as they see fit, maybe a religion the "community" disagrees with, or even teach them that the current "dear leader" is a tyrant? And the "community" will not insist on teaching those children the glories of the current regime?

If you believe that you will undoubtedly be interested in a good deal on this tower in Paris that I know about.

> Apparently you don't even understand the meaning of "We the
> People".

I understand it quite well. It was just an introduction to the constitution wherein the founders went on to put some strict limits on government. They certainly never intended for the collective to own our children. Claiming that they did is either outright lying or plain stupidity.

John Manning

2/18/2014 8:45:00 PM

0

On 2/18/2014 2:56 PM, hlillywh@juno.com wrote:
> On Monday, February 17, 2014 7:34:48 AM UTC-8, John Manning wrote:
>
>> And just what do you think she means when she says that children belong to the collective, not to their parents?
>> It's not difficult to see that she was referring to children as
>> being not merely
>> the 'property' of their parents, but being an inseparable living
>> part of the community
>> as a whole - similarly as the founding fathers referred to the
>> United States of America
>> as "We the People".
> So you think the "community" will own the children but allow their parents to teach them as they see fit, maybe a religion the "community" disagrees with, or even teach them that the current "dear leader" is a tyrant? And the "community" will not insist on teaching those children the glories of the current regime?

Your sick paranoid fantasies are showing, Hilly Whoo.

I, along with most people who haven't lost their minds, advocate for
*QUALITY*
public education. *NOWHERE did I or anyone else say or suggest* the garbage
your demented paranoid little mind just made up above.


>
> If you believe that you will undoubtedly be interested in a good deal on this tower in Paris that I know about.
>
>> Apparently you don't even understand the meaning of "We the
>> People".
> I understand it quite well. It was just an introduction to the constitution wherein the founders went on to put some strict limits on government.

It appears that you have reading comprehension problems, Hilly Whoo. You
*STILL*
haven't addressed the *MEANING*** *of just the* *words* *"We the
People**".*

You *also* snipped and ignored the following:

Standardized*, *quality* *Public Education is what made the nation *
- *as a******DIVERSE yet** WHOLE community* - *so great. *

*Try looking up the *meaning of the words* "E Pluribus Unum"on the
Seal of the United States of America, you mendacious halfwit.**
**

> They certainly never intended for the collective to own our children. Claiming that they did is either outright lying or plain stupidity.

*NO ONE* is claiming that any collective *"owns"* anyone's
children except *paranoid crackpots like you.*

Children *ARE* however, whether you like it or not, an inseparable
living part
of the community of humanity - unless you want them to live with you in
an isolated
location separated from the rest of the world. That would be something a
paranoid
fringe nutcase like you would likely think is normal and healthy for
your kids.

You're clearly not dealing with a full deck, Hilly Whoo.

Your weak little mind seems to be governed by a surreal paranoid fantasy
that somehow
public education, which is common*GLOBALLY in EVERY *civilized
industrial nation
- and has been*THE COMMON BASIC FOUNDATION OF EDUCATION* in the
United States of America since the colonial days, *is now****- ALL OF A
SUDDEN - *
*something akin to **communist re-education camps.**
*
It sounds like you've been listening to your fellow Mormon sicko
crackpot and fraud, Glenn Beck, who
actually suggested that Obama was building vast FEMA re-indoctrination
camps for anyone who opposes him.

You need help, Mr Lillywhite.