tomservo56954
2/7/2013 6:04:00 PM
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 7:47:36 AM UTC-5, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:13:17 -0600, Dakota <markp@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On 2/4/2013 3:07 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>
> >> In article <61lug8h32pmdl5rqci5otdq2kpbbur2g61@4ax.com>,
>
> >> J <jdyoung1@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> I read this suggestion in another ng and found it to be a perfect
>
> >>> solution to the issue of including gays in the 'Boy Scouts'. They do
>
> >>> have a 'Girl Scouts' for females, so it's not that something like this
>
> >>> hasn't been tried and accepted by society already. A separate but
>
> >>> equal 'Gay Scouts' could easily be incorporated and would be highly
>
> >>> successful. They could have gay Scout leaders and parents would be
>
> >>> comfortable knowing who their boys would be spending overnight trips
>
> >>> in the woods with. There is no logical reason to oppose this idea.
>
> >>
>
> >> And then we can have water fountains just for blacks. And restaurants
>
> >> just for non-Irish. And country clubs for non-Jews.
>
>
>
> >Perhaps a separate but equal Roman Catholic Church for pedophiles
>
> >would be acceptable to J as well.
>
>
>
> God already singles them out--watching them hump kids keeps Him amused.
>
>
>
> The dukester, American - American
>
>