duke
2/4/2013 12:24:00 PM
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:49:15 -0800 (PST), alanp-s@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>On Feb 2, 11:13?pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 19:32:20 -0800 (PST), alan...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>> >On Feb 1, 8:05?am, Patrick <pbarker...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:02:41 +0000, Mozzer <mozzer.moz...@yahoo.co.uk>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 31/01/2013 18:54, GabeAmit...@woh.rr.com wrote:
>>
>> >> >> "Mentalguy2k8" ?wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>> If your kids get eaten by bears, you are a lousy parent. ?Don't blame God,
>> >> >>>> you are the error.
>>
>> >> >>> So my kids deserve to get mauled and eaten by bears for being a little bit
>> >> >>> mischievous and it'll be my fault if they are?
>>
>> >> >> Can't you read?
>> >> >> Duke said that if you allow your kids to be eaten by bears, it is your
>> >> >> fault. ?You are whining about something that may have happened in the
>> >> >> ancient past. ?If you really want to know more about God, just ask.
>>
>> >> >Wow, you claim to know about God? You must have a source of information
>> >> >denied to science.
>>
>> >> Do you feel science can answer everything?
>>
>> >Science is still very much in it's infancy, so no, of course science
>> >cannot answer even a tiny fraction of ?"everything". To me, the
>> >scientific method is a type of mental discipline that, when used
>> >properly, can assist a human being to perform feats of discovery that
>> >the not-completely-rational human mind would otherwise be incapable of
>> >performing, in much the same way that the discipline and training a
>> >soldier receives enables him to do things that he would otherwise be
>> >incapable of doing.
>>
>> We use logic and reason to ascertain that God truly is.
>
>You're kidding! A god that splits itself into 3 parts and then sends 1
>part of itself to be tortured by a bunch of savages in order to
>appease the other 2 parts that stayed in "heaven" - to you this is
>"logical" and "reasonable"?
Well, you sure didn't apply any in that comment.
>Get outta here! :)
Heeheehee. You got a flat zero grade on that definition.
>> >Your religious "training" does not prepare or equip your mind and/or
>> >body to do anything remotely useful or clever or entertaining or
>> >anything. :) All it does for you (and us) is to make you look stupid.
>
>> >> Why are we still searching for things then?
>
>> >To get us as far away from primitive superstitious religion-inspired
>> >nonsense fallacies just as quick as our cerebellums can take us :)
>> One day science may grow up enough to come to accept the existence of almighty
>> God. ?You know it's impossible to say no.
>Laugh! You think that if there really was an Infinite Intelligence
>that's the creator and maintainer of everything, that it'd be anything
>like the troubled, angry, psychotic sadistic monster that's portrayed
>in the hebrew bible?
In the Christian bible in which God fully reveals himself as all love.
>> > And cause the stuff science gives us is cool and neat. The problem
>> >with your silly bible is that there's nothing in it that can compare
>> >with all the new stuff and new ideas that science has given us
>> Did science give us love, compassion, empathy, sincerity, helping others? ? No,
>Of course not, idiot. And neither did your imaginary sky daddy.
God is ALL those things.
>All those behaviors came into being in the way as explained by the
>theory of evolution.
Guided in that direction by love itself - almighty God.
>Love and hate, compassion and indifference, sincerity and
>deceptiveness, helping others or attacking others, all of these
>behaviors and more, in some way have contributed to the likelihood of
>creatures, including your and my ancestors, living long enough to
>reproduce.
Yet it's our time of choice - love of God, or no love in satan. Choose wisely.
>I know you accept the theory of evolution, not because it "makes
>sense", but because your church commands you to believe it.
Stupid comment. I think you meant "creation". You're one of those people that
believes the universe just popped into existence because of itself.
> If your
>church suddenly decided that the TOE was invalid, you'd immediately
>start denouncing it. That's the type of stupid believe-bot that you
>are. Ptoohey!
You really shouldn't try to tell others what they believe. That takes a
knowledge base you don't have. The proper term is creation then evolution.
>> those come from God.
>Nope.
Nope what?
>> Science taught us what a frog's guts are like.
>>?Heeheehee.
>Still giving us the hyena imitations dukie. You've been told about
>that. It makes you look stupid. Stop it now. Or better yet, do it some
>more.
No, I make YOU look stupid.
>> You can't fix stupid.
>You are living proof of that.
Yet you are the one that said nothing in defense of your beliefs.
The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************