[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.python

PHP Developer highly interested in Python (web development) with some open questions...

Tamer Higazi

2/24/2008 5:49:00 AM

Hi!
My brother is dreaming and dying for python and swear that it is the
ultimate killer application language.

I am coding Webapplication in PHP5 and ask myself if for python are:

- application frameworks like: "Zend Framework" and ezComponents
- What is the Zope Applikation Server? Is it also a Webserver like the
Apache or Tomcat Webserver?

- Is there a way of Round Tripp engineering based on UML XMI Files to
generate python files (with it's dependencies) ????

- Let us assume, I want to write a Web application in Python (what I did
now in PHP5) and want to distribute my work under commercial usage.

Can I encrypt my work and generate Licence Files for Customers who would
purchase my End-Sollution like with:

- Zend Encoder
- IonCube
- SourceGuardian

???

I just ask, because I have finished a product and will encrpyt it with
the Ioncube encoder based on PHP5.

for answering all my Questions, I would thank you guys very much.



Tamer Higazi
7 Answers

CE

2/26/2008 8:40:00 AM

0

about the encryption:

is ur product more valuable than the linux kernel?

Don Phillipson

6/25/2014 12:36:00 PM

0

"SolomonW" <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote in message
news:110ntip2c02xg$.k6rvle6rz36j.dlg@40tude.net...

> In 1943 the British had only limited bombing capacity in France.

This seems incorrect. Bomber Command Order of Battle 4 March 1943
(printed in the official RAF history in 1954) shows 34 heavy (4-engined)
bomber squadrons among total 65 squadrons. Harris was able to launch
(occasionally) 1000 bombers at a time from 30 May 1943 (Cologne) and
the US 8th Air Force was expanding day-bombing capacity as fast as
(high) casualties allowed (say 300 aircraft by this date.) This "limited
bombing capacity" was twice that of the Luftwaffe in 1943 or any other
air force.
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

Rich Rostrom

6/25/2014 8:59:00 PM

0

"Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> wrote:

> "SolomonW" <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote:

> > It would also have serious consequence if the Germans can mount them on
> > U-boats.
>
> Not technically likely, because a U-boat would have
> to be on the surface for significant time (20 to 60
> minutes?) in order to prepare RATO apparatus (there
> being no launch ramp.)

ISTM that a U-boat with custom fittings could get one
off faster than that. Some were launched from aircraft
catapults, which could be mounted.

However, ISTN that the boat could carry only one missile,
even though a V-1 weighed less than a single torpedo.

All this invites the question of whether the Germans
ever considered trying it. If the V-1 had been
available in 1943 I think they would have.

> Antisubmarine patrols and radar were by 1943 likely
> to finding and attack any U-boat on the surface for
> so long...

Maybe. First it has to be detected, then identified,
then something has to go and look and attack.

> within 100 miles of British shores.

V-1 range was 160 miles.

> U-boats would be more effective in other theatres.
--
The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

http://originalvelvetrevo...

SolomonW

6/26/2014 12:11:00 PM

0

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:59:06 -0500, Rich Rostrom wrote:

> All this invites the question of whether the Germans
> ever considered trying it. If the V-1 had been
> available in 1943 I think they would have.

Later in the war when the V2 were available Karl Dönitz was very keen to
mount rockets on U-boats.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www...

Don Phillipson

6/26/2014 3:17:00 PM

0

"SolomonW" <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote in message
news:1clshevzol2uy$.1uywexd76w3mk.dlg@40tude.net...

> Later in the war when the V2 were available Karl Dönitz was very keen to
> mount rockets on U-boats.

Evidence? Dönitz had by then spent 25 years thinking about
U-boat warfare. It would be surprising if he ever saw a use for
them to launch at any targets (land or sea) missiles with a circle
of error of 5 to 10 miles. V2s were at that date unstoppable, but
carried only one ton of explosive and killed on average one
person per launch.
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

SolomonW

6/28/2014 8:43:00 AM

0

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:16:46 -0400, Don Phillipson wrote:

> "SolomonW" <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote in message
> news:1clshevzol2uy$.1uywexd76w3mk.dlg@40tude.net...
>
>> Later in the war when the V2 were available Karl Dönitz was very keen to
>> mount rockets on U-boats.
>
> Evidence? Dönitz had by then spent 25 years thinking about
> U-boat warfare. It would be surprising if he ever saw a use for
> them to launch at any targets (land or sea) missiles with a circle
> of error of 5 to 10 miles. V2s were at that date unstoppable, but
> carried only one ton of explosive and killed on average one
> person per launch.

I remember reading of Donitz meeting with Hitler where he expressed a
desire for a launcher to fire missiles from a U-boat.

In any case I did find this reference on the net.

http://www.ww2f.com/topic/15820-u-boat-rocke...

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www...

SolomonW

6/28/2014 7:03:00 PM

0

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:35:41 -0400, Don Phillipson wrote:

> "SolomonW" <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote in message
> news:110ntip2c02xg$.k6rvle6rz36j.dlg@40tude.net...
>
>> In 1943 the British had only limited bombing capacity in France.
>
> This seems incorrect. Bomber Command Order of Battle 4 March 1943
> (printed in the official RAF history in 1954) shows 34 heavy (4-engined)
> bomber squadrons among total 65 squadrons. Harris was able to launch
> (occasionally) 1000 bombers at a time from 30 May 1943 (Cologne) and
> the US 8th Air Force was expanding day-bombing capacity as fast as
> (high) casualties allowed (say 300 aircraft by this date.) This "limited
> bombing capacity" was twice that of the Luftwaffe in 1943 or any other
> air force.

I suppose it depends on your definition of limited.

1943 the British bomb tonnage was 157457; the US was 44165 making a total
201622 ton.

Putting aside the improvements that were available in 1944 to Bomber
command compared to what they had in 1943 and just work on quantity

In 1944, the British had 525518 tons, and the US was 389119 making a total
of 914637 tons.

That is much less.

The allies spent about 15% of the bombing trying to stop V1 and V2 with
only marginal success. 15% is 137196 tons. Not much less than the total
British tons in 1943.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www...