comp.lang.ruby

6127 Dead, 1270 since 1/20/09

1/31/2012 2:21:00 AM

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:57:48 -0800, MattB wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:34:49 +0000 (UTC), 2875 Dead <dead@gone.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:19:40 -0800, MattB wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:08:02 -0800, 2875 Dead <dead@dead.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:16:03 -0800, MattB <trdell1234@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:45:17 +0000 (UTC), 2875 Dead <dead@gone.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:19:00 -0800, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:39:22 -0800 (PST), wy <wy_@myself.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Jan 30, 1:24??am, MattB <notrdell1...@gmail.comspam.> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:08:13 -0800 (PST), wy <w...@myself.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >On Jan 30, 12:58??am, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:21:45 -0800 (PST), wy
>>>>>>>>> >> <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> >On Jan 29, 11:03??pm, MattB <notrdell1...@gmail.comspam.>
>>>>>>>>> >> >wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> >> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:59:47 +0000 (UTC), 2875 Dead
>>>>>>>>> >> >> <d...@gone.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/low-iq-conservative-belie...
>>>>>>>>> >> >> >prejudice-180403506.html
>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice By
>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Stephanie Pappas | LiveScience.com ? 3 hrs ago There's no
>>>>>>>>> >> >> >gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and
>>>>>>>>> >> >> >prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study
>>>>>>>>> >> >> >that is bound to stir public controversy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >> While many Conservatives are a little racist so are many
>>>>>>>>> >> >> liberals.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >> Liberals support terrorist. ??Then there are conservatives
>>>>>>>>> >> >> like Richard that are racist. ??Now by what I have seen low
>>>>>>>>> >> >> IQ might have something to do with both liberal support of
>>>>>>>>> >> >> terrorist and racism in general.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >> The extreme left are leninist and then we have the Tea
>>>>>>>>> >> >> Party that wants government aided capitalism.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >> ??Then we have Obama a idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >Obama a idiot. ??That's funny, in an idiot sort of way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> ?? Do you think giving guns to Drug Lords is smart? ?? Do you
>>>>>>>>> >> ?? think
>>>>>>>>> >> signing a treaty like ACTA was not the act of a idiot?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> ??Obama is either a idiot or not in charge. ??Which is it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >A idiot. ??What a idiot you are. ??A idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ?? ??So you have no defense for him ??selling guns to drug lords
>>>>>>>>> ?? ??that are
>>>>>>>>> then used on our own people? ?? ??Then you have no logical reason
>>>>>>>>> for him signing ACTA.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ??You can't show he isn't a Idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Ring-a-ding. Hello? Knock-knock. Who's there? Don't tell me
>>>>>>>>it's ... a idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_izsdBzmzfog/S-La0xRuoxI/AAAA...
>>>>>>oGIFnTezk/s1600/ObamaSucks.jpg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Obama is all about Leninism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So what is Leninism, exactly?
>>>>>
>>>>> I've answered that at least twice.
>>>>>
>>>>Hmm, yes. I just spotted this one:
>>>>
>>>>"Leninism is the body of political theory for the democratic
>>>>organization of a revolutionary vanguard party, and the achievement of
>>>>a direct-democracy dictatorship of the proletariat, as political
>>>>prelude to the establishment of socialism."
>>>>
>>>>You're spouting absolute nonsense, you know. Nobody is pushing for a
>>>>direct-democracy dictatorship of any sort, and if socialism comes, it
>>>>will be because the present system imploded completely.
>>>>
>>>>Certainly Obama and the Democrats are nowhere near your definition.
>>>
>>> Well I can hope not. Socialism has been proven to be a failed
>>> system.
>>
>>Depends what you mean by "socialism". If you mean communism, then yes,
>>it's certainly a failed system. But the most successful countries in
>>the world are socialist: Sweden, Norway, Germany, France...
>
> Been to some of those countries and they may have a socialist bend
> to them they are pure socialist?. Personal I don't like pure socialism
> or Capitalism. The USA government aided Capitalism I really don't like.
>
>
Now what on earth is "pure socialism"?
>
>>> Yet even lenin had to start out small. If he gets a second term we
>>> will see the true agenda come out. Whatever that is. Gun Control I
>>> suspect is on the list.
>>
>>Now you're beginning to sound like a paranoid teabagger.
>
> Now your just getting dirty and mean. Just for that I'm going to
> call you Eddie Haskell. :-)))

Secret agendas? Gun Control? It sounds like the stuff Eddie spouts.
>
>
>
>>>
>>> BTW I know many Democrats that aren't far left. They are almost
>>> Independents as are many Republicans. People who would be willing to
>>> compromise and get half of what they want than nothing. The Extremist
>>> on both the right and left would rather our country implode that give
>>> a inch. IMO
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>?Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent
>>>>>>revolution inevitable? -JFK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>??Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
>>inevitable?? -JFK





--
???Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
inevitable??? -JFK





--
???Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
inevitable??? -JFK