Jason
1/19/2013 9:13:00 PM
In article <4lllf8p0ntsmf3obrgotq2npebs0p2d2vb@4ax.com>, Free Lunch
<lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:06:30 -0800, Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote in
> alt.atheism:
>
> >In article <4h5kf81dke1gp8gafjqo39a7ksqglddss2@4ax.com>, Free Lunch
> ><lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> ...
> >> Only in the way it is presented. The problem is real. Guns are used to
> >> kill children on a daily basis and the NRA and its gun-worshipping
> >> acolytes would rather see those killings continue than cut the number
> >> that are dying from gun shots.
> >>
> >> You have made it clear that you will do nothing to get the number of
> >> dead children lower. This is also more evidence that the so-called
> >> pro-life folks like you don't actually care about life.
> >
> >Yes, I did. I believe having armed guards and metal detectors in public
> >schools would lower the death rate in the public schools.
>
> Children do not only die in schools. They are most commonly shot at or
> near home, intentionally or by accident. Your willingness to cut the
> quality of education so we have armed guards at schools doesn't fix that
> problem at all, but it does hurt education since you refuse to support
> taxes on gunowners to pay for the danger their guns inflict on others.
Perhaps if there had been armed guards at Sandy Hook, there may have been
a lower death rate.