Aaron Brady
2/7/2008 5:07:00 AM
On Feb 6, 4:59 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de...@nospam.web.de> wrote:
> castiro...@gmail.com schrieb:
>
>
>
>
>
> > def run3( block ):
> > for _ in range( 3 ):
> > block()
>
> > run3():
> > normal_suite()
>
> > Introduces new syntax; arbitrary functions can follow 'colon'.
>
> > Maintains readability, meaning is consistent.
>
> > Equivalent to:
>
> > def run3( block ):
> > for _ in range( 3 ):
> > block()
>
> > @run3
> > def anonfunc():
> > normal_suite()
>
> > Simplification in cases in which decorators are use often.
>
> This is non-sensical - how do you invoke anonfunc? They would all bind
> to the same name, run3. Or to no name as all, as your "spec" lacks that.
>
> Besides, it's butt-ugly IMHO. But taste comes after proper definition...
>
> Diez- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The fallacy here is that @run3 as described is not a typical
decorator, such one that returns a function. It is called at
"definition"-time, that is, when the function definition is executed,
and executes the code.