Yukihiro Matsumoto
4/10/2009 8:46:00 AM
Hi,
In message "Re: Why ruby license?"
on Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:46:07 +0900, Johan Gustav <johan.postbox@gmail.com> writes:
|1. Why has Ruby its own license and are not licensed under something
|like the Apache license?
Just because Ruby is older than Apache.
|2. Why is Ruby not dual license with the Apache license, rather then the
|GPL? which I understand is more closer to the ruby license and not as
|restrictive as the GPL license?
It needs GPL dual to accomplish GPL compatibility. I don't want to
see any problem linking with GPL libraries, e.g. readline.
matz.