[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

make error during svn build (192

John Maclean

4/6/2009 12:20:00 PM

any pointers on this build error?

git svn clone http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/... ruby
--revision 22000:23142
cd ruby
gc clean

autoconf --verbose


/configure --prefix=3D/home/jayeola/ix -program-suffix=3D192

# snip

checking limits.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: limits.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: limits.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: limits.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: limits.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: limits.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: limits.h: in the future, the compiler will take precede=
nce


# snip
version.h:42:23: error: revision.h: No such file or directory
checking for nroff... /usr/bin/nroff
config.h unchanged
ruby192 library version =3D 1.9.1
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile


make
gcc -g -O2-O3 -g -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses
-Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -I.
-I.ext/include/i686-linux -I./include -I. -DRUBY_EXPORT -o main.o -c
main.c
cc1: error: invalid option argument =91-O2-O3=92
make: *** [main.o] Error 1


--=20
John Maclean
07739 171 531
MSc (DIC)

Timezone: GMT

3 Answers

Brian Candler

4/6/2009 2:33:00 PM

0

john maclean wrote:
> any pointers on this build error?

You could start by describing your build environment (at minimum OS name
and version)

> gcc -g -O2-O3 -g ...
> cc1: error: invalid option argument �-O2-O3�

Looks like you have something in your environment which is adding
unwanted extra flags to the gcc command line. Try 'printenv' and look
for something which might be doing that.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Nobuyoshi Nakada

4/6/2009 2:52:00 PM

0

Hi,

At Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:19:33 +0900,
john maclean wrote in [ruby-talk:333115]:
> any pointers on this build error?

Sorry, fixed now.

--
Nobu Nakada

PL

4/2/2011 2:27:00 AM

0

On 2/04/2011 4:27, T.Schmidt.Teddy@gmail.com wrote:
> Genial Castro,(snip)

el tonto gasto miles de millones de dolares mientras que el pueblo tenia
hambre.
El contrario de genial.



>
> "PL"<pl.nospam@pandora.be> wrote in message
> news:M3vlp.16193$rF.9722@newsfe12.ams2...
>> No te preocupes: Castro abandono todo:
>>
>> El proyecto nuclear que Cuba no pudo desarrollar
>> 16-03-11 | Pol??tica
>>
>> La agencia Reuters dio a conocer fotograf??as de una central at??mica
>> abandonada en la isla. El proyecto fue paralizado en 1991, tras el
>> colapso de la Uni??n Sovi??tica
>>
>> La crisis nuclear que suscitaron las explosiones y los incendios en la
>> planta de Fukushima, en Jap??n, coloc?? a la energ??a at??mica en el centro
>> del debate. Pa??ses de todo el mundo, incluidos algunos latinoamericanos,
>> vuelven a analizar los proyectos que tienen en marcha o sus programas a
>> futuro.
>>
>> Una serie de fotograf??as de la agencia Reuters muestra ahora las
>> instalaciones donde el r??gimen cubano pretend??a erigir una central
>> at??mica. El predio, abandonado desde hace a??os, presenta se??ales que
>> indican que est?? prohibido ingresar.
>>
>> Las im??genes, tomadas el 20 de enero de 2010, captan lo que fue la
>> central Juragua, ubicada a m??s de 300 kil??metros de La Habana. El
>> proyecto se inici?? en 1983, pero debi?? ser cancelado en 1991 tras la
>> ca??da de la Uni??n Sovi??tica, que lo financiaba.
>>
>> A fines de ese a??o, Fidel Castro inform?? que el r??gimen abandonar??a la
>> exploraci??n nuclear para focalizarse en otros tipos de energ??a.
>>
>> http://america.infobae.com/notas/20974-El-proyecto-nuclear-que-Cuba-no-pudo-d...
>>
>>
>> http://cubafaq.impela.net/2011/03/el-proyecto-nuclear-que-cuba-no-pudo-de...
>>
>> "Yoani Sanchez
>>
>> Cuba's Only Nuclear Reactor Is Crumbling
>> Posted: 03/28/11 06:39 PM ET
>>
>> In our little room, he told us that morning about the time he had spent
>> in the USSR. He'd only been in Havana a few hours, after an Aeroflot
>> plane had brought him back from his long sojourn in the land of
>> Gorbachev. The gothic letters on his diploma showed he'd graduated from
>> the university in some kind of engineering my childish mind couldn't
>> understand. It was the first time I'd heard about the Juragu?? nuclear
>> reactor, which was built in Cienfuegos in 1983. The recent arrival's
>> voice described an enormous VVER 440 reactor located in central Cuba as
>> if it were a live dragon breathing its whiffs on us. Hundreds of young
>> people, trained in research centers nearly 6,000 miles from home, would
>> work there as atomic scientists. Millions and millions of rubles
>> arriving from the Kremlin helped to construct what would be the pinnacle
>> of our "tropical socialism," the fundamental pillar of our energy
>> independence.
>>
>> Later I learned that this young enthusiast never worked as a nuclear
>> engineer. The Soviet Union was dismembered just as the first of two
>> planned reactors was 97% complete. Grass covered a good part of the
>> site, and exposure to the elements broke down everything from pieces of
>> the core, to the steam generators, the cooling pumps and the isolation
>> valves. Juragu?? became a new ruin, a monument to the delusions of
>> grandeur left us by Soviet imperialism.
>>
>> With his graying temples, while cutting metals in his new career as a
>> lathe operator, the one-time expert told me now, "It was lucky we didn't
>> start it up." According to what he and his colleagues had calculated,
>> the chances of an nuclear accident at Juragu?? were 15% more than at any
>> other nuclear plant in the world. "We would have ended up with the
>> island cut in half," he said dramatically. I imagined a piece of the
>> nation here and another over there, while a stubbornly smoking hole
>> changed our national geography.
>>
>> Now that the plant in Fukushima is spreading its residues, and with them
>> fear, I can't but rejoice that the Cienfuegos reactor has not awakened,
>> that under the concrete sarcophagus a nuclear reaction hasn't started.
>> Thinking about all that has happened, all of our current problems seem
>> small to us, insignificant trifles compared to the horrifying spread of
>> radioactivity.
>>
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/yoani-sanchez/cubas-own-nuclear-reactor_b_841058....
>>
>> http://cubafaq.impela.net/2011/03/cubas-only-nuclear-reactor-is-...
>>
>> Mas:http://cubafaq.impela.net/?s=Juragu%C3%A1&sea...
>
>