Thibaut Barrère
3/4/2009 9:27:00 AM
> One other thought: if it's simple, look at JSON. It's easy to extend to
> serialise arbitrary Ruby objects.
I've been thinking about that. One point that made me choose YAML
instead is that YAML support is built-in in STD ruby, where JSON is
not (AFAIK).
As well from my experience YAML is better covered than JSON on other
platforms (such as .Net)...
That's why I choosed YAML for the moment.
> YAML can do things like handling multiple references to the same object,
> but it sounds like you don't need that level of sophistication.
I don't need this for the moment, but it may come :)
cheers and thanks for the feedback, appreciated
-- Thibaut