Dee Earley
5/25/2010 11:48:00 AM
On 23/05/2010 14:12, Jim Mack wrote:
> CRC32 has the benefit of being very fast to calculate, and if you're
> already reasonably sure that the file is correct -- you've done the
> obvious, like check byte length -- then CRC32 is probably enough. Even
> for very long files, the odds of a mis-hit are minuscule. The reason
> is that it's millions of times more likely to generate a false
> negative than a false positive.
Err, how?
An algorithm should always give the same output for the same input,
especially when used as a hash, but the different input data may well
lead to to the same output, giving the opposite to your statement.
--
Dee Earley (dee.earley@icode.co.uk)
i-Catcher Development Team
iCode Systems
(Replies direct to my email address will be ignored.
Please reply to the group.)