[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

ruby info

John Maclean

2/23/2009 4:09:00 AM

Why isn't there a ruby node within info? Will there ever be one or is
it not a worthwhile project?

--
John Maclean
07739 171 531
MSc (DIC)

Timezone: GMT
7 Answers

Phlip

2/23/2009 4:25:00 AM

0

john maclean wrote:

> Why isn't there a ruby node within info? Will there ever be one or is
> it not a worthwhile project?

What do you mean? a ruby.info site? grab it and run with it if you like!

Michael Malone

2/23/2009 4:33:00 AM

0

Phlip wrote:
> john maclean wrote:
>
>> Why isn't there a ruby node within info? Will there ever be one or is
>> it not a worthwhile project?
>
> What do you mean? a ruby.info site? grab it and run with it if you like!
>
I think he means 'info ruby' much like 'man ruby' although, when I type
'info ruby' I get a response! It exists for me.

=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================

John Maclean

2/23/2009 5:13:00 AM

0

2009/2/23 Michael Malone <michael.malone@tait.co.nz>:
> Phlip wrote:
>>
>> john maclean wrote:
>>
>>> Why isn't there a ruby node within info? Will there ever be one or is
>>> it not a worthwhile project?
>>
>> What do you mean? a ruby.info site? grab it and run with it if you like!
>>
> I think he means 'info ruby' much like 'man ruby' although, when I type
> 'info ruby' I get a response! It exists for me.
>
> =======================================================================
> This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
> addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
> the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
> lost by reason of this transmission.
> If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
> apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
> other act on the email.
> Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
> altered or corrupted during transmission.
> =======================================================================
>
>
>

OK `info ruby` is pretty much the same as `man ruby`. Compare that to
`info awk` or `info tar`. Those docs are many nodes deep.

--
John Maclean
07739 171 531
MSc (DIC)

Timezone: GMT

Phlip

2/23/2009 5:24:00 AM

0

john maclean wrote:

> OK `info ruby` is pretty much the same as `man ruby`. Compare that to
> `info awk` or `info tar`. Those docs are many nodes deep.

This is not a joke: "Google ruby" nearly always works for me!

If I could, I would remove every one of those obsolete systems from my hard
drives...

Joel VanderWerf

2/23/2009 7:55:00 AM

0

john maclean wrote:
> OK `info ruby` is pretty much the same as `man ruby`. Compare that to
> `info awk` or `info tar`. Those docs are many nodes deep.
>

Nice thing about info pages is that you can open them in a browser
(well, Konqueror, with info:make and so on) and follow links as if they
were html. I never could stand the command-line based info readers, and
the man pages for things like make always refer you to info for full
documentation.

--
vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407

Albert Schlef

2/23/2009 12:32:00 PM

0

Phlip wrote:
> john maclean wrote:
>
>> OK `info ruby` is pretty much the same as `man ruby`. Compare that to
>> `info awk` or `info tar`. Those docs are many nodes deep.
>
> This is not a joke: "Google ruby" nearly always works for me!

I think his question amounts to: "Why isn't there an official user-guide
bundled with Ruby?"

That's a good question. Other popular languages, such as Python, Perl,
PHP, come with a good guide. For Ruby, the answer for people asking for
documentation is almost always "buy the XYZ book".
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

John Maclean

2/23/2009 1:48:00 PM

0

2009/2/23 Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:09:07PM +0900, john maclean wrote:
>> Why isn't there a ruby node within info? Will there ever be one or is
>> it not a worthwhile project?
>
> I like to think it's because info pages suck.
>
> --
> Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.ap... ]
> Quoth FreeBSD Secure Programming Guidelines: "In fact, never ever use
> gets() or sprintf(), period. If you do - we will send evil dwarfs after
> you."
>

I'm sure that most people don't have a problem with ruby buying books,
I have. However Ruby's sometimes a bit like emacs, a few moments when
you come across something and think "wow - if only I knew that when I
was working on project X". Dunno how much you can bundle into the
official release without being bloat.

--
John Maclean
07739 171 531
MSc (DIC)

Timezone: GMT