[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Testing against an api

Brent Collier

1/23/2009 3:39:00 PM

When testing code that consumes a web service, is it bad for the
tests/specs to actually hit the api, or should the get/post/whatever
requests be stubbed out?

I'm currently writing a Ruby gem for a particular micro-blogging api. My
tests actually make requests against the api and I was just wondering if
maybe I shouldn't be doing that...
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

3 Answers

Andrew Timberlake

1/23/2009 3:54:00 PM

0

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Brent Collier <brentmc79@gmail.com> wrote:

> When testing code that consumes a web service, is it bad for the
> tests/specs to actually hit the api, or should the get/post/whatever
> requests be stubbed out?
>
> I'm currently writing a Ruby gem for a particular micro-blogging api. My
> tests actually make requests against the api and I was just wondering if
> maybe I shouldn't be doing that...
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-....
>
>
Two reasons you shouldn't
1) It slows down your tests which means your run them less often or stop
testing eventually
2) Your calls will be directly affecting the remote service and actually
creating, modifying or deleting things in the process (not usually what you
want to do while testing)

--
Andrew Timberlake
http://ramblingso...
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew...

"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education" - Mark Twain

Phlip

1/23/2009 7:13:00 PM

0

Brent Collier wrote:
> When testing code that consumes a web service, is it bad for the
> tests/specs to actually hit the api, or should the get/post/whatever
> requests be stubbed out?

Two reasons it's bad. The first is a simple rule "never hit the wire at test
time". It annoys the remote server, and exposes your test runs to false
negatives if that server is down (or when it finally blacklists your development
workstation!).

The other rule is Mike Feathers's guideline for testing: "Test cases should
never touch the file system, the database, or the wires." That's not a rule,
it's just a head-game to encourage his disciples to decouple their code and
improve its isolation and encapsulation. Intermediate logic code should not have
runaway dependencies on low-level code with side-effects.

> I'm currently writing a Ruby gem for a particular micro-blogging api. My
> tests actually make requests against the api and I was just wondering if
> maybe I shouldn't be doing that...

Run those tests one last time, with p statements that barf out the low-level
responses as strings.

Use Mocha to mock the HTTP::Post activity (or whatever), and copy those tests
into the .returns(). Then run your tests with your network wire unplugged (yes,
and take a long uneasy break from twitter, boingboing, apod, chat, google, RSS,
and this newsgroup!), and make sure all your tests still pass.

--
Phlip

Matt Todd

1/24/2009 1:00:00 AM

0

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Check out fakeweb which can be used to help mock out your web service calls
easily:
http://technicalpickles.com/posts/stop-net-http-dead-in-its-tracks-wi...

Matt



On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:

> Brent Collier wrote:
>
>> When testing code that consumes a web service, is it bad for the
>> tests/specs to actually hit the api, or should the get/post/whatever
>> requests be stubbed out?
>>
>
> Two reasons it's bad. The first is a simple rule "never hit the wire at
> test time". It annoys the remote server, and exposes your test runs to false
> negatives if that server is down (or when it finally blacklists your
> development workstation!).
>
> The other rule is Mike Feathers's guideline for testing: "Test cases should
> never touch the file system, the database, or the wires." That's not a rule,
> it's just a head-game to encourage his disciples to decouple their code and
> improve its isolation and encapsulation. Intermediate logic code should not
> have runaway dependencies on low-level code with side-effects.
>
> I'm currently writing a Ruby gem for a particular micro-blogging api. My
>> tests actually make requests against the api and I was just wondering if
>> maybe I shouldn't be doing that...
>>
>
> Run those tests one last time, with p statements that barf out the
> low-level responses as strings.
>
> Use Mocha to mock the HTTP::Post activity (or whatever), and copy those
> tests into the .returns(). Then run your tests with your network wire
> unplugged (yes, and take a long uneasy break from twitter, boingboing, apod,
> chat, google, RSS, and this newsgroup!), and make sure all your tests still
> pass.
>
> --
> Phlip
>
>


--
Matt Todd
Highgroove Studios
www.highgroove.com
cell: 404-314-2612
blog: maraby.org

Scout - Web Monitoring and Reporting Software
www.scoutapp.com