Michal Suchanek
1/15/2009 11:10:00 AM
2009/1/14 Tim Mcd <tmcdowell@gmail.com>:
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2009/1/14 Tim Mcd <tmcdowell@gmail.com>:
>>> Yeah, that ruby-ncurses binding isn't the best, lots of methods are
>>> missing and other little things (like 'include Ncurses' not working
>>> correctly). Any OTHER TUI libraries?
>>
>> If you look through the forum somebody suggested curses FFI bindings I
>> think but I don't know how far that got.
> I'll look into that, thanks.
>
>>
>> If you find the ruby curses bindings insufficient, post about its
>> deficiencies so that they can be worked out.
> I thought Ruby-Ncurses development was dead?
I meant the ruby curses extension that is included in stdlib.
It is probably not developed very actively but if you find some
limitations that can be resolved without introducing incompatibilities
(or in any reasonable way for 1.9) there is a good chance that such
change will be included.
Thanks
Michal