duke
12/13/2012 12:39:00 PM
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:36:33 +1100, "Andrew W" <remove_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
wrote:
>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:nrehc81380lt97j0741mbq2jmj3hb9nfl7@4ax.com
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:19:26 -0800, Linuxgal
>> <teresita@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>>
>>> duke wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:44:35 -0500,SilentOtto@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps you can comment on the 6 days of creation.
>>>>>> There was no six days of creation.
>>>>>> That's more lies and more making shit up.
>>>>>> You said so yourself.
>>>>>> "Gen 1-11 isn't a scientific document".
>>>> Yep, Gen 1-11 is not scientific.
>>
>>> Hence the Roman Catholic Church has no scientific basis for the Fall
>>> of Man
>>
>> God called it "Adventures of Adam and Eve".
>So then there's no original sin and no need to be saved from those 'flames'
>and 'satan' you love talking about.
Then you don't understand the adventures of A&E.
>You know, the one who tells people to -
>"drop 'em, bend over, put your head between your legs and kiss your
>ass goodbye. And then he mounts you. Heeheehee. "
The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************