[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.javascript

Javascript needed to work in tandem with a backend

bit-naughty

5/11/2015 6:00:00 PM

Hi,
I want that a menu should popup on a mouseclick on a couple of <div>s onscreen, with for example, a URL as one of the clickable options, ie. "Click this to go to yahoo.com". Thing is, the URL will need to be with args to the backend PHP script, ie. 'yahoo.com/search="gloop" '.However the page itself will by a dynamically generated one, ie. the backend script has to fill in the "gloop", according to whatever behaviour I want.

How to do this, please? I'm getting a little confused as to the quoting, for starters. Can you guys help? :)


Thanks so much.
24 Answers

rst0wxyz

2/23/2012 2:54:00 AM

0

On Feb 22, 12:24 pm, Satish <sk.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 10:44 am, rst0 <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > This crazy SOB has created a world of his own.
> > I don't have to look at Gary Locke as a model citizen.
> > I am my own model citizen as I stand.
>
> You are the model of hypocrisy and treachery. As long as you earned
> your salary as an employee of Lockheed, you kept your traitorous
> feelings secret. In fact you did everything possible to obtain and
> retain your secret clearance to work on advanced weapons systems at
> Lockheed.
>
> It is only after you retired that you unveiled your talons. Now you
> unabashedly preach the line of the CCP-dictatorship. But you know
> which side of the toast is buttered. That is why you are staying put
> in USA to live on pension from Lockheed and on US social security
> checks.
>
> USA is free enough to allow you to bark on the internet. The CCP-
> dictatorship is very different - it keeps tabs on who writes what on
> the internet. And there is swift reprisal if any resident in China
> were foolish enough to denounce CCP-dictatorship for its many acts of
> omission and commission.
>
> But as I said before, barking on the internet is one thing but biting
> the hand that feeds you is another. if you get caught biting the hand
> that feeds you, you will be in deep shit. A few bad apples among the
> Chinese-Americans who had worked for defense contractors like Lockheed
> and Boeing are already in jail for selling defense secrets and
> proprietary technologies to the CCP-dictatorship.
>
> As a 74-year old retired person you have ample time on your hand to
> spend 24/7 on the internet and litter it with your inanities. And idle
> brain is indeed the devil's workshop. But be careful. Don't end up in
> jail for selling out USA to the CCP-dictatorship for pecuniary gains.
> You might end up spending your golden years in a jail cell.

rst0wxyz

2/23/2012 2:57:00 AM

0

Why don't you join your follow indiscriminate killer Mallu to clean up
humanity and its mess.

Myself Mallu, Yourself?

2/23/2012 1:52:00 PM

0

On 2/22/2012 6:57 PM, rst0 wrote:
> Why don't you join your follow indiscriminate killer Mallu to clean up
> humanity and its mess.

"Indiscriminate killer?" Wow! That's a new one. Who have I "killed"?

Wonder what China would have done if jihadi baboons had flown planes in
Shanghai skyscrapers? Philosophized? Wrestled with "moral issues" about
war? Stopped buying Arab oil? Paid protection money? Turned to Japan for
"protection"? Attacked Tibet? Attacked Taiwan? Attacked all neighbors?
Import turtles? Turned Buddhist?

Assuming that China would indeed go to war, would there be more
"philosophizing" and worrying about "collateral damage"? Does the
Chinese war doctorine call for drawing up battlefield lines (like a
gridiron) and have referees? Fighting only lasts from dawn to dusk and
is confined only to the "arena"? Would the rules require uniforms for
both sides? Are helmets optional?


--
VB, Ubetjotushy
'ome=shanty

-----
About the Jihadi Loon Squad:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A jihadi loon is someone like Jade Muckeraj.

"Jade Muckeraj" aka "The Old Cow of Hawaii" <charlatan@fraudsrus.com>
tries her best to pretend she is a Hindu -- cutting and pasting, and
even doctoring what others post/write about Hindus/Hinduism on the
internet, deliberately pidginizing Sanskrit and providing wrong
translations, inventing brand new books in the Mahabharat (reducing it
to Muckabharat), stalking and abusing people who disagree with her by
hijacking their posts, and then cuts and pastes about Hindu ethics and
moans self-righteously about honesty -- and succeeds spectacularly in
convincing all, except other jihadi loons, that she is not a Hindu.
She is in fact a creepy jihadi loon, who thinks she owns the newsgroup
s.c.indian, and has absolutely no problem slandering anyone. As a
Indian citizen supposedly, she meddles in US political issues, and
advocates civil war in India.

Myself Mallu, Yourself?

2/23/2012 1:56:00 PM

0

On 2/22/2012 11:09 AM, rst0 wrote:
> On Feb 22, 10:58 am, "bmo...@nyx.net"<bmo...@nyx.net> wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 6:08 pm, rst9<rst9w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> It's not needed. Besides, China would not allow it.
>>
>> How convenient.
>>
>>> Whether it's good or not is none of your business.
>>
>> That's kind of odd, coming from someone who has an opinion on
>> everything.
>
> What China is doing is no one else's business but China's. China has
> demonstrated its own ability to raise the standard of living for its
> citizens for all to see. Today, China has done more for their
> citizens than any other country in the world.

Raised the standard of living using Uncle Sam's money, downright shady
trade practices, and export of substandard crap. Yeah, it has done more
for its ethnic Han citizens than any other country in the world -
altered the demographics of Tibet and Xinjiang via indiscriminate
settling and killing.

--
VB, Ubetjotushy
'ome=shanty

-----
About the Jihadi Loon Squad:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A jihadi loon is someone like Jade Muckeraj.

"Jade Muckeraj" aka "The Old Cow of Hawaii" <charlatan@fraudsrus.com>
tries her best to pretend she is a Hindu -- cutting and pasting, and
even doctoring what others post/write about Hindus/Hinduism on the
internet, deliberately pidginizing Sanskrit and providing wrong
translations, inventing brand new books in the Mahabharat (reducing it
to Muckabharat), stalking and abusing people who disagree with her by
hijacking their posts, and then cuts and pastes about Hindu ethics and
moans self-righteously about honesty -- and succeeds spectacularly in
convincing all, except other jihadi loons, that she is not a Hindu.
She is in fact a creepy jihadi loon, who thinks she owns the newsgroup
s.c.indian, and has absolutely no problem slandering anyone. As a
Indian citizen supposedly, she meddles in US political issues, and
advocates civil war in India.

rst0wxyz

2/23/2012 7:03:00 PM

0

On Feb 23, 5:52 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
<KalluMallu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/22/2012 6:57 PM, rst0 wrote:
>
> > Why don't you join your follow indiscriminate killer Mallu to clean up
> > humanity and its mess.
>
> "Indiscriminate killer?" Wow! That's a new one. Who have I "killed"?

Being a cheerleader for Uncle Sam's Might makes right. We have the
might. We have the right.

>
> Wonder what China would have done if jihadi baboons had flown
> planes in Shanghai skyscrapers?

That IS something to think about, isn't it? Why haven't they flown
planes against skyscrapers in China? You don't think or know the
answers to these questions. That shows how brainwashed and stupid you
are.

Does the answer of:
"They have nothing against China"
ever occur to you?


> Philosophized?

Yes, I am just sitting in front of my computer and philosophize what
life was, is and will be or should be about. I am retired so I have
lots of time to think, to feel, to see, to hear, to smell, to sense
and to philosophize.

> Wrestled with "moral issues" about war?

Yes, specifically, indiscriminate killing of the innocents and
destruction of properties.


> Stopped buying Arab oil?

Automobiles are currently built using oil products. Until we change
to electric cars altogether, we can't get away from it.


> Paid protection money?

Huh!!! Don't know what you're referring to.

> Turned to Japan for "protection"?

Huh!!! Don't know what you're referring to.

> Attacked Tibet?

They tried already and failed. I don't think they will try again.


> Attacked Taiwan?

No need to attack. Taiwan is already in China's hands.

> Attacked all neighbors?

Who? where?

> Import turtles?

Yes, if the price is right.


> Turned Buddhist?

Religion is superstitions. If it's up to me, I say eliminate all
religions.

>
> Assuming that China would indeed go to war, would there be more
> "philosophizing" and worrying about "collateral damage"?

When there is war, only the power of the gun counts. Nothing else
counts.

> Does the
> Chinese war doctorine call for drawing up battlefield lines (like a
> gridiron) and have referees?

You (or we) all have seen what war is like today. It's an unseen
enemy all around you. Haven't you seen today news? Two U.S. soldiers
killed by an Afghan soldier and disappeared into the crowd. That is
what we are fighting against.

> Fighting only lasts from dawn to dusk and
> is confined only to the "arena"? Would the rules require
> uniforms for both sides?

You still haven't learned, have you? From the days of the Vietnam War
to today, and for all future wars, war means 24-hour war, all over the
world. There is no "arena", the uniform doesn't mean anything as we
have seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.


> Are helmets optional?

With today's high power explosives, does it really matters?

>

rst0wxyz

2/23/2012 7:21:00 PM

0

On Feb 23, 5:56 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
<KalluMallu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/22/2012 11:09 AM, rst0 wrote:
>
> > On Feb 22, 10:58 am, "bmo...@nyx.net"<bmo...@nyx.net>  wrote:
> > What China is doing is no one else's business but China's.
> > China has demonstrated its own ability to raise the
> > standard of living for its citizens for all to see.
> > Today, China has done more for their citizens than any
> > other country in the world.
>
> Raised the standard of living using Uncle Sam's money,

If you are so conscience about China making money, why don't you stop
buying Chinese-made products?


> downright shady trade practices,

Again, it's your own fault. Don't blame the Chinese. They will make
money however they can.

> and export of substandard crap.

You don't have to buy their products. Their products sell well
because people (consumers) see values in their products. If they
don't, they won't buy them.

> Yeah, it has done more
> for its ethnic Han citizens than any other country in the world -

Every citizen in China is enjoying their new-found wealth. The only
thing I see is you are jealous of their new-found wealth.

> altered the demographics of Tibet and Xinjiang via indiscriminate
> settling and killing.
>

Where did you hear this? Regardless of where you are, there are
always people who are unhappy with something. That is to be
expected. Otherwise, we wouldn't be human.

Myself Mallu, Yourself?

2/24/2012 2:55:00 PM

0

On 2/23/2012 11:21 AM, rst0 wrote:
> On Feb 23, 5:56 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
> <KalluMallu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/22/2012 11:09 AM, rst0 wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 22, 10:58 am, "bmo...@nyx.net"<bmo...@nyx.net> wrote:
>>> What China is doing is no one else's business but China's.
>>> China has demonstrated its own ability to raise the
>>> standard of living for its citizens for all to see.
>>> Today, China has done more for their citizens than any
>>> other country in the world.
>>
>> Raised the standard of living using Uncle Sam's money,
>
> If you are so conscience about China making money, why don't you stop
> buying Chinese-made products?
>

Yup, try my best to avoid cheap crap. Oh, I don't buy stuff that is made
in Pakistan either.

>
>> downright shady trade practices,
>
> Again, it's your own fault. Don't blame the Chinese. They will make
> money however they can.
>

But, Americans should not make money however they can? Americans should
not look out for their business interests?

>> and export of substandard crap.
>
> You don't have to buy their products. Their products sell well
> because people (consumers) see values in their products. If they
> don't, they won't buy them.
>
>> Yeah, it has done more
>> for its ethnic Han citizens than any other country in the world -
>
> Every citizen in China is enjoying their new-found wealth. The only
> thing I see is you are jealous of their new-found wealth.
>

New-found wealth? How was that wealth found? It wasn't found. It was
made, and made the old-fashioned way - by shady practices. One is
supposed to accept this shady way of doing business as a new "role model"?

>> altered the demographics of Tibet and Xinjiang via indiscriminate
>> settling and killing.
>>
>
> Where did you hear this? Regardless of where you are, there are
> always people who are unhappy with something. That is to be
> expected. Otherwise, we wouldn't be human.
>

Baloney! The demographic balance of both Tibet and Xinjiang is being
altered by unleashing carpetgabber Han (yeah, the same kind that landed
in the US and left with a giant sucking sound). Why does China have
unrest in those areas? Too much wealth?

--
VB, Ubetjotushy
'ome=shanty

-----
About the Jihadi Loon Squad:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A jihadi loon is someone like Jade Muckeraj.

"Jade Muckeraj" aka "The Old Cow of Hawaii" <charlatan@fraudsrus.com>
tries her best to pretend she is a Hindu -- cutting and pasting, and
even doctoring what others post/write about Hindus/Hinduism on the
internet, deliberately pidginizing Sanskrit and providing wrong
translations, inventing brand new books in the Mahabharat (reducing it
to Muckabharat), stalking and abusing people who disagree with her by
hijacking their posts, and then cuts and pastes about Hindu ethics and
moans self-righteously about honesty -- and succeeds spectacularly in
convincing all, except other jihadi loons, that she is not a Hindu.
She is in fact a creepy jihadi loon, who thinks she owns the newsgroup
s.c.indian, and has absolutely no problem slandering anyone. As a
Indian citizen supposedly, she meddles in US political issues, and
advocates civil war in India.

Myself Mallu, Yourself?

2/24/2012 3:11:00 PM

0

On 2/23/2012 11:02 AM, rst0 wrote:
> On Feb 23, 5:52 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
> <KalluMallu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/22/2012 6:57 PM, rst0 wrote:
>>
>>> Why don't you join your follow indiscriminate killer Mallu to clean up
>>> humanity and its mess.
>>
>> "Indiscriminate killer?" Wow! That's a new one. Who have I "killed"?
>
> Being a cheerleader for Uncle Sam's Might makes right. We have the
> might. We have the right.
>

Bullshit! Uncle Sam has every right to defend himself against aggression
by baboons.

>>
>> Wonder what China would have done if jihadi baboons had flown
>> planes in Shanghai skyscrapers?
>
> That IS something to think about, isn't it? Why haven't they flown
> planes against skyscrapers in China? You don't think or know the
> answers to these questions. That shows how brainwashed and stupid you
> are.
>

Baloney! Watch the province of Xinjiang and over the years you'll see a
nice jihadi movement build up there (non-stop Han migration will not
help either), thanks to China's "ally", Pakistan. When those bombs start
going off, let us see how China deals with it. I am sure there will
peaceful negotiations and money changing hands, and more bombings till
the PLA gets into the mix. Never mind! There is already a healthy PLA
presence already in there to keep the natives quite and, gasp, "defend"
the motherland.

> Does the answer of:
> "They have nothing against China"
> ever occur to you?
>

How do you know? You read the very "honest reporting" in the Chinese media?

>
>> Philosophized?
>
> Yes, I am just sitting in front of my computer and philosophize what
> life was, is and will be or should be about. I am retired so I have
> lots of time to think, to feel, to see, to hear, to smell, to sense
> and to philosophize.
>

Bollocks! You aren't philosophizing at all. You are simply indulging in
politics. Spouting your anti-US political views and favoring China.

>> Wrestled with "moral issues" about war?
>
> Yes, specifically, indiscriminate killing of the innocents and
> destruction of properties.
>
>
>> Stopped buying Arab oil?
>
> Automobiles are currently built using oil products. Until we change
> to electric cars altogether, we can't get away from it.
>
>
>> Paid protection money?
>
> Huh!!! Don't know what you're referring to.
>
>> Turned to Japan for "protection"?
>
> Huh!!! Don't know what you're referring to.
>

The questions were about what China would do if attacked by jihadi
baboons? Since the "philosophical view" is against retaliation, what
would China do?

>> Attacked Tibet?
>
> They tried already and failed. I don't think they will try again.
>
>
>> Attacked Taiwan?
>
> No need to attack. Taiwan is already in China's hands.
>

Really? Since when? Taiwan says China is in its hands.

>> Attacked all neighbors?
>
> Who? where?
>

Tibet, Xinjiang, and Mongolia (in the past).

>> Import turtles?
>
> Yes, if the price is right.
>
>
>> Turned Buddhist?
>
> Religion is superstitions. If it's up to me, I say eliminate all
> religions.
>

No need to 'eliminate' religion. Just make sure it is confined to one's
home and does not spill over into politics.

>>
>> Assuming that China would indeed go to war, would there be more
>> "philosophizing" and worrying about "collateral damage"?
>
> When there is war, only the power of the gun counts. Nothing else
> counts.
>
>> Does the
>> Chinese war doctorine call for drawing up battlefield lines (like a
>> gridiron) and have referees?
>
> You (or we) all have seen what war is like today. It's an unseen
> enemy all around you. Haven't you seen today news? Two U.S. soldiers
> killed by an Afghan soldier and disappeared into the crowd. That is
> what we are fighting against.
>

There are only two choices - (1) the US should fight dirty, or (2) the
US should wipe the country clean. There is no way that unshaven monkeys
should dictate terms. If these unshaven monkeys get their way, it would
mean the end of human civilization.

>> Fighting only lasts from dawn to dusk and
>> is confined only to the "arena"? Would the rules require
>> uniforms for both sides?
>
> You still haven't learned, have you? From the days of the Vietnam War
> to today, and for all future wars, war means 24-hour war, all over the
> world. There is no "arena", the uniform doesn't mean anything as we
> have seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.
>

Yes, and so countries change their war doctrine, strategies, tactics,
weapons and deployment, ... Drones do make a nice clean way of culling
baboon populations, don't they?

>
>> Are helmets optional?
>
> With today's high power explosives, does it really matters?
>
>>


--
VB, Ubetjotushy
'ome=shanty

-----
About the Jihadi Loon Squad:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A jihadi loon is someone like Jade Muckeraj.

"Jade Muckeraj" aka "The Old Cow of Hawaii" <charlatan@fraudsrus.com>
tries her best to pretend she is a Hindu -- cutting and pasting, and
even doctoring what others post/write about Hindus/Hinduism on the
internet, deliberately pidginizing Sanskrit and providing wrong
translations, inventing brand new books in the Mahabharat (reducing it
to Muckabharat), stalking and abusing people who disagree with her by
hijacking their posts, and then cuts and pastes about Hindu ethics and
moans self-righteously about honesty -- and succeeds spectacularly in
convincing all, except other jihadi loons, that she is not a Hindu.
She is in fact a creepy jihadi loon, who thinks she owns the newsgroup
s.c.indian, and has absolutely no problem slandering anyone. As a
Indian citizen supposedly, she meddles in US political issues, and
advocates civil war in India.

rst9

2/24/2012 6:45:00 PM

0

On Feb 24, 7:10 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
<KalluMallu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/23/2012 11:02 AM, rst0 wrote:
>
> > On Feb 23, 5:52 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
> > <KalluMallu...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > Being a cheerleader for Uncle Sam's Might makes right.
> > We have the might.  We have the right.
>
> Bullshit! Uncle Sam has every right to defend himself against
> aggression by baboons.

If Uncle Sam hadn't terrorist them first, they wouldn't have a need to
fight back.

>
> > That IS something to think about, isn't it?  Why haven't
> > they flown planes against skyscrapers in China?  You don't
> > think or know the answers to these questions.  That shows
> > how brainwashed and stupid you are.
>
> Baloney! Watch the province of Xinjiang and over the years
> you'll see a nice jihadi movement build up there (non-stop

When you have different people with different background, there are
always troubles. We have a lot of troubles with Native American
Indians, too. And what do you we do with them? Same as China, arrest
them and send them to jail.

> Han migration will not help either), thanks to China's "ally",
> Pakistan. When those bombs start going off, let us see how
> China deals with it. I am sure there will peaceful negotiations
> and money changing hands, and more bombings till the PLA gets
> into the mix. Never mind! There is already a healthy PLA
> presence already in there to keep the natives quite and, gasp,
> "defend" the motherland.

Let China take care of their problems. It is none of our business.
We have enough problems at home already with Native American Indians,
illegal immigrants, drugs, illegal guns,...

Our law-enforcement personnel got their hands full, too. So what are
you complaining about?

>
> > Does the answer of:
> > "They have nothing against China"
> > ever occur to you?
>
> How do you know? You read the very "honest reporting" in the Chinese media?

When the "twin Tower of China" collapse, we will know.

>
> > Yes, I am just sitting in front of my computer and
> > philosophize what life was, is and will be or should be
> > about. I am retired so I have lots of time to think,
> > to feel, to see, to hear, to smell, to sense
> > and to philosophize.
>
> Bollocks! You aren't philosophizing at all. You are simply
> indulging in politics.

Isn't politics a subject to philosophize about, too?


> Spouting your anti-US political views and favoring China.

I only speak the truth as I see it. I am NOT anti-U.S. and I
certainly are NOT for China. After all, I live in the U.S. I don't
live in China.

>
> > Yes, specifically, indiscriminate killing of the innocents and
> > destruction of properties. Automobiles are currently built
> > using oil products.  Until we change
> > to electric cars altogether, we can't get away from it.
>
> > Huh!!!  Don't know what you're referring to.
>
> > Huh!!!  Don't know what you're referring to.
>
> The questions were about what China would do if attacked by jihadi
> baboons?

Let China worry about that. It's none of my business.

> Since the "philosophical view" is against retaliation, what
> would China do?
>

Let China worry about that. It's none of my business.

> > They tried already and failed.  I don't think they will try again.
>
> > No need to attack.  Taiwan is already in China's hands.
>
> Really? Since when? Taiwan says China is in its hands.

So they are saying the same thing. Since Taiwan moved all their
manufacturing facilities to China, and many Taiwanese are living in
Mainland China. It's only a matter of time before both are one.

>
> > Who? where?
>
> Tibet, Xinjiang, and Mongolia (in the past).

Let China worry about that. It's none of my business.

>
> > Yes, if the price is right.
>
> > Religion is superstitions.  If it's up to me, I say eliminate all
> > religions.
>
> No need to 'eliminate' religion. Just make sure it is confined to one's
> home and does not spill over into politics.
>

Fine.

> > When there is war, only the power of the gun counts.  Nothing else
> > counts.
>
> > You (or we) all have seen what war is like today.  It's an unseen
> > enemy all around you.  Haven't you seen today news? Two U.S. soldiers
> > killed by an Afghan soldier and disappeared into the crowd.  That is
> > what we are fighting against.
>
> There are only two choices - (1) the US should fight dirty, or (2) the
> US should wipe the country clean.

What do you think we have been trying to do since we were there? we
fought dirty and we tried to wipe them out without success.


> There is no way that unshaven monkeys
> should dictate terms.

Well, Mallu, face it, they ARE dictating the terms.


> If these unshaven monkeys get their way, it would
> mean the end of human civilization.

Well, Mallu, they got their ways. We can't stop them.

>
> > You still haven't learned, have you?  From the days of the Vietnam War
> > to today, and for all future wars, war means 24-hour war, all over the
> > world.  There is no "arena", the uniform doesn't mean anything as we
> > have seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.
>
> Yes, and so countries change their war doctrine, strategies, tactics,
> weapons and deployment, ... Drones do make a nice clean way of culling
> baboon populations, don't they?

Mallu, drones only cause more angry Muslims for revenge against us.

>
> > With today's high power explosives, does it really matters?
>

rst9

2/24/2012 9:38:00 PM

0

On Feb 24, 6:55 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
<KalluMallu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/23/2012 11:21 AM, rst0 wrote:

> > If you are so conscience about China making money, why
> > don't you stop buying Chinese-made products?
>
> Yup, try my best to avoid cheap crap. Oh, I don't buy stuff
> that is made in Pakistan either.

Hoo-ray for you!!!

> > Again, it's your own fault.  Don't blame the Chinese.
> > They will make money however they can.
>
> But, Americans should not make money however they can?

But we do!!! Remember one time, I mentioned the U.S. banned DDT use
in the U.S., but we continue to sell them to foreign countries.

> Americans should not look out for their business interests?

We sold more American products than any other country.

>
> > You don't have to buy their products.  Their products sell well
> > because people (consumers) see values in their products.  If they
> > don't, they won't buy them.
>
> > Every citizen in China is enjoying their new-found wealth.
> > The only thing I see is you are jealous of their new-found
> > wealth.
>
> New-found wealth?

Yes.

> How was that wealth found?

By selling their manufactured products to other countries.


> It wasn't found. It was made, and made the old-fashioned way -

Right, it was made the old-fashioned way, which is hard work.

> by shady practices.

If they can do it, why can't you? What prevent you from doing it?


> One is supposed to accept this shady way of doing business
> as a new "role model"?

Oh!!! yeah!! When the other guy is living well, you always accuse him
of "shady deals". That is the loser's way of dealing with the real
problem.

> > Where did you hear this?  Regardless of where you are, there are
> > always people who are unhappy with something.  That is to be
> > expected.  Otherwise, we wouldn't be human.
>
> Baloney! The demographic balance of both Tibet and Xinjiang
> is being altered by unleashing carpetgabber Han (yeah, the
> same kind that landed in the US and left with a giant sucking sound).

Sounds like jealousy to me. On the other hand, I have always said
national boundaries change with the power of the gun. It was true in
the past, it's still true today and continue to be true in the
future. If you don't like the changes in Tibet and Xinjiang, take up
arms and go there and fight for its freedom. This is the only way you
can change it.


> Why does China have unrest in those areas? Too much wealth?

With the CIA stirring the pot, it is to be expected.

>