Lorne
2/16/2014 2:30:00 PM
On 16/02/2014 14:23, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> In article <barmar-28DF9F.02062116022014@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> In article <150220142032389140%michelle@michelle.org>,
>> Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
>>
>>> S deals, none vul. I was North
>>>
>>> KQJ32
>>> AJ2
>>> KJ
>>> Q64
>>>
>>> T9854
>>> K
>>> A98
>>> AKT7
>>>
>>> Our bidding:
>>>
>>> S N
>>> 1S 2NT (Jacoby)
>>> 3H 4NT
>>> 5H 6S
>>> P
>>
>> It's usually a bad idea to use Blackwood when you have a suit where
>> neither partner has shown a control. After South bid 3H, North should
>> temporize with 3S, to give South a chance to cue bid. When South bids
>> 4C, then North can bid 4NT. Or, since North is making a slam try by
>> temporizing, and South has all the side suits controlled, South can bid
>> Blackwood then.
>
> Good point. It's something I didn't think of (I was North), but I'm
> not sure that my partner would have realized what was going on if I had
> bid 3S, and would merely have bid 4S.
>
3S should show slam interest, otherwise you would have bid 4S.
It is a very important part of slam bidding that you agree that when an
auction is game forcing a jump to game is minimum for previous bids and
bidding trumps at a lower level shows interest in which controls partner
has - keeping the auction low to give maximum space to explore the hand.