[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

[ANN] rspec 1.1.9 Released

David Chelimsky

10/21/2008 5:13:00 AM

rspec version 1.1.9 has been released!

* <http://rspec...

Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby.

Changes:

### Version 1.1.9 / 2008-10-20

WARNING: This release removes implicit inclusion of modules in example groups.
This means that if you have 'describe MyModule do', MyModule will not be
included in the group.

* 2 major enhancements

* Add extend to configuration (thanks to advice from Chad Fowler)
* Modules are no longer implicitly included in example groups

* 4 minor enhancements

* mingw indicates windows too (thanks to Luis Lavena for the tip)
* improved output for partial mock expecation failures
* it_should_behave_like now accepts n names of shared groups
* eliminated redundant inclusion/extension of ExampleGroupMethods

* 6 bug fixes

* spec command with no arguments prints help
* fixed typo in help. Fixes #73.
* fixed bug where should_receive..and_yield after similar stub added
the args_to_yield to the stub's original args_to_yield (Pat Maddox)
* fixed bug where rspec-autotest (autospec) was loading non-spec
files in spec directory. Fixes #559.
* fixed bug where should_not_receive was reporting twice
* fixed bug where rspec tries to run examples just because it is
required (even if there are no examples loaded). Fixes #575.

* <http://rspec...
4 Answers

Roger Pack

10/22/2008 6:10:00 AM

0

David Chelimsky wrote:
> rspec version 1.1.9 has been released!

Thanks for rspec--it totally rocks. The stubbing mechanism and the
english like syntax are very very very nice.

Thanks!
-=R
PS Here's wishing for 1.9 support some day <flips a coin>.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Charles Oliver Nutter

10/24/2008 5:02:00 AM

0

It seems the spec task somehow depends on spicycode-rcov, which is not
available on RubyForge. Was that an unintentional glitch?

- Charlie

David Chelimsky wrote:
> rspec version 1.1.9 has been released!
>
> * <http://rspec...
>
> Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby.
>
> Changes:
>
> ### Version 1.1.9 / 2008-10-20
>
> WARNING: This release removes implicit inclusion of modules in example groups.
> This means that if you have 'describe MyModule do', MyModule will not be
> included in the group.
>
> * 2 major enhancements
>
> * Add extend to configuration (thanks to advice from Chad Fowler)
> * Modules are no longer implicitly included in example groups
>
> * 4 minor enhancements
>
> * mingw indicates windows too (thanks to Luis Lavena for the tip)
> * improved output for partial mock expecation failures
> * it_should_behave_like now accepts n names of shared groups
> * eliminated redundant inclusion/extension of ExampleGroupMethods
>
> * 6 bug fixes
>
> * spec command with no arguments prints help
> * fixed typo in help. Fixes #73.
> * fixed bug where should_receive..and_yield after similar stub added
> the args_to_yield to the stub's original args_to_yield (Pat Maddox)
> * fixed bug where rspec-autotest (autospec) was loading non-spec
> files in spec directory. Fixes #559.
> * fixed bug where should_not_receive was reporting twice
> * fixed bug where rspec tries to run examples just because it is
> required (even if there are no examples loaded). Fixes #575.
>
> * <http://rspec...
>


Luis Lavena

10/24/2008 6:23:00 AM

0

On Oct 24, 2:02 am, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nut...@sun.com>
wrote:
> It seems the spec task somehow depends on spicycode-rcov, which is not
> available on RubyForge. Was that an unintentional glitch?
>
> - Charlie
>

The gem was build with RubyGems 1.3, which allow you have runtime and
development dependencies.

With RubyGems 1.3.0 spicycode-rcov is not installed, but with 1.2 it
does.

I hope JRuby can jump soon to 1.3 (and soon 1.3.1) for us to rejoice
of development and runtime dependencies (at last, no more hoe
dependencies for us).

So: was unintentional :-)

Regards,
--
Luis Lavena

Charles Oliver Nutter

10/24/2008 3:43:00 PM

0

Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2:02 am, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nut...@sun.com>
> wrote:
>> It seems the spec task somehow depends on spicycode-rcov, which is not
>> available on RubyForge. Was that an unintentional glitch?
>>
>> - Charlie
>>
>
> The gem was build with RubyGems 1.3, which allow you have runtime and
> development dependencies.
>
> With RubyGems 1.3.0 spicycode-rcov is not installed, but with 1.2 it
> does.
>
> I hope JRuby can jump soon to 1.3 (and soon 1.3.1) for us to rejoice
> of development and runtime dependencies (at last, no more hoe
> dependencies for us).
>
> So: was unintentional :-)

1.3 update is planned for JRuby 1.1.5 (soon).

- Charlie