Neolibertarian
12/24/2012 2:21:00 PM
In article
<e624c7ab-be67-428c-ad75-b2a6910cfa2d@j4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
"TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
<thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 23, 6:23?pm, Neolibertarian <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <4f8b2709-1189-4cb5-a4cd-ebbef1caf...@f4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> > ?"TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
> >
> > ?<comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > First is the movies and video games, then the real thing. Our kids are
> > > bored to death (who can blame them) and prepare for the big show, the
> > > ticket to celebrity where the role of good guy and bad guy is
> > > insignificant.
> >
> > > I shared this house with a family whose kid (14 years old) was bored
> > > to death in this place in upstate NY, the boondocks so to speak, no
> > > place to walk or hike,
> >
> > Wait a minute. You should at least make your anecdotal stories plausible.
> >
> > I've been to upstate New York, and if you can't find a place to walk or
> > hike there, then you probably can't find the back of your trousers,
> > either.
>
> Sorry, no place to walk or hike whatsoever. I mean you must drive for
> half an hour before getting to a hiking place and kids don't drive. I
> don't mention biking because there are too many hills for may taste,
> but I'm sure you could do some excellent mountain biking were it
> available. The only hiking place nearby was a short trail provided by
> a Buddhist retreat. You must be very enlightened to take advantage of
> that.
>
> His mom made a point of not letting him walk for the danger involved.
> NO SHOULDER OR SIDEWALK.
What a bunch of wussies.
All you need is a good pair of boots, a couple of canteens and a walking
stick. Who needs a trail? In the Catskills and Adirondacks, for crying
out loud! Some of the most beautiful country on God's greed earth.
> > > and he would spend the day sleeping and at
> > > night he would connect with a group of like-minded kids playing a
> > > helicopter pilot on a mission to kill. It seems to me they are a time
> > > bomb and something may trigger their killing instincts.
> >
> > Video games are hardly more violent than tv programming of the 1950s and
> > 1960s. If you've never watched them, just the /names/ of the programs
> > corroborates my point, don't you think?
> >
> > "Have Gun Will Travel." "Gunsmoke." "Bat Masterson." "Colt .45" "Gun
> > Slinger." "The Marshall of Gunsight Pass." "The Outlaws."
> >
> > Even kids shows were filled with mayhem, gunplay and violence--from Bugs
> > Bunny to Roy Rogers.
> >
> > Where were the mass school shootings back then?
>
> Not to the point of obsession.
Average tv viewing was on the order of 7 hours a day for some 90
millions.
> This kid often went to bed at 5 am. And
> you weren't an active participant back then. Maybe a matinee movie but
> not the whole night shooting people.
The body counts were similar, especially when added up over the whole
week.
Young boys were ESPECIALLY active participants, because their favorite
toys were guns. When they weren't watching people shooting each other on
tv, they were outside shooting each other with cap guns. BB guns, too.
At age 12 or so, many boys received a .22 for Christmas.
I don't think you have made your case. It isn't the graphically violent
video games, movies and tv shows "causing" the weird and tragic violence
of our time. That has been with our children in one form or another
since time immemorial.
However, there is something missing from today's movies, tv shows and
video games which was very much prevalent in the tv shows and movies
back then.
This might explain the problem.
Can you guess what's missing?
--
Neolibertarian
"Global Warming: It ain't the heat, it's the stupidity."