[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

rb_include_module() doesn't call Module#included

ddungum

9/19/2008 11:22:00 AM

I'm writing a c extension and I want to create a class called "World"
in C which includes a ruby module "Serializable".

# autoexec.rb
module Serializable
def self.included( otherMod )
puts "Serializable is included by #{otherMod.name}"
end
end

// World.c
...
rb_load( rb_str_new2("autoexec.rb"), 0 );
VALUE klass = rb_define_class("World", rb_cObject);
rb_include_module( klass, rb_eval_string("Serializable") );

# in IRB
>> require "World.so"
=> true
>> World.included_modules
=> [Serializable, Kernel]

As you can see, class "World" includes module "Serializable", but
Serializable#included is not called.
I saw rb_mod_include (not rb_include_module) calls Module#included
explicitly in eval.c, but it's declared as a static function, so I
can't use it in my source code.

I think this problem is a bug, but how do you think ?

By the way, if I replace rb_include_module call with this,
Module#included is called fortunately.

VALUE args [1] = { rb_str_new2("include Serializable") };
rb_mod_module_eval( 1, args, klass );

But I don't want to use eval function because it's relatively slow.
4 Answers

Tim Hunter

9/19/2008 11:35:00 AM

0

ddungum@gmail.com wrote:
> By the way, if I replace rb_include_module call with this,
> Module#included is called fortunately.
>
> VALUE args [1] = { rb_str_new2("include Serializable") };
> rb_mod_module_eval( 1, args, klass );
>
> But I don't want to use eval function because it's relatively slow.

You could use rb_funcall instead.

--
RMagick: http://rmagick.ruby...

hyoonjae

9/19/2008 12:07:00 PM

0

Tim Hunter <TimHun...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> You could use rb_funcall instead.
>

Thanks for your reply, Tim.
But I'm not sure you mean something like this :

VALUE args [1] = { rb_str_new2("Serializable") };
rb_funcall( klass, rb_intern("include"), 1, args );

Am I correct ?

Tim Hunter

9/19/2008 12:24:00 PM

0

unknown wrote:
> Tim Hunter <TimHun...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> You could use rb_funcall instead.
>>
>
> Thanks for your reply, Tim.
> But I'm not sure you mean something like this :
>
> VALUE args [1] = { rb_str_new2("Serializable") };
> rb_funcall( klass, rb_intern("include"), 1, args );
>
> Am I correct ?

The argument to include is a module, not a string, so you'll need to
pass the Serializable module VALUE instead of the string "Serializable".
If you've defined Serializable in C, then that would be the return value
from rb_define_module_under (or whatever function you called to define
Serializable). If you've defined Serializable in Ruby, then you'll have
to call rb_const_get get the value of Serializable.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

hyoonjae

9/19/2008 12:38:00 PM

0

Thanks for you detailed explanation, Tim.