[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Keyzcar - cryptographic toolkit

Kless

9/14/2008 10:05:00 AM

Google has released Keyzcar [1], an open source cryptographic toolkit
designed to make it easier and safer for developers to use
cryptography in their applications. Keyczar supports authentication
and encryption with both symmetric and asymmetric keys.

By now there are Java and Python implementations (C++ coming soon).


[1] http://www.ke...
6 Answers

Kless

10/15/2008 6:39:00 PM

0

On 14 sep, 11:05, Kless <jonas....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Google has released Keyzcar [1], an open source cryptographic toolkit
> designed to make it easier and safer for developers to use
> cryptography in their applications.Keyczarsupports authentication
> and encryption with both symmetric and asymmetric keys.
>
> By now there are Java and Python implementations (C++ coming soon).
>
> [1]http://www.ke...

It is not really necessary to create a Ruby implementation thanks to
JRuby [1], which lets to call Java from JRuby [2].

I have created Keyczar4r [3], an example which to let access to the
Java version. It has been a great experience to knowing that both Ruby
and Java mix as the charm.


[1] http://jruby.cod...
[2] http://wiki.jruby.org/wiki/Calling_Java_...
[3] http://github.com/kless/keyczar4r/tree/master/lib/...

Ben Bleything

10/15/2008 6:52:00 PM

0

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, Kless wrote:
> It is not really necessary to create a Ruby implementation thanks to
> JRuby [1], which lets to call Java from JRuby [2].

Sure it is. I'm not using JRuby. What do I do?

Ben

Florian Gilcher

10/15/2008 8:35:00 PM

0


On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:51 PM, Ben Bleything wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, Kless wrote:
>> It is not really necessary to create a Ruby implementation thanks to
>> JRuby [1], which lets to call Java from JRuby [2].
>
> Sure it is. I'm not using JRuby. What do I do?
>
> Ben
>

Wait for the C implementation.

Regards,
Florian

Ben Bleything

10/15/2008 10:10:00 PM

0

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, Florian Gilcher wrote:
>> Sure it is. I'm not using JRuby. What do I do?
>
> Wait for the C implementation.

Yeah :) It was a rhetorical question; that was my point.

Ben

Jeremy Hinegardner

10/16/2008 5:10:00 PM

0

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:34:56AM +0900, Florian Gilcher wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:51 PM, Ben Bleything wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, Kless wrote:
>>> It is not really necessary to create a Ruby implementation thanks to
>>> JRuby [1], which lets to call Java from JRuby [2].
>>
>> Sure it is. I'm not using JRuby. What do I do?
>>
>> Ben
>>
>
> Wait for the C implementation.

Or use Ruby Java Bridge[1], I'm using rjb to access work with Lucene indexes.
It works like a charm.

enjoy,

-jeremy

[1] - http://rjb.ruby...

--
========================================================================
Jeremy Hinegardner jeremy@hinegardner.org


Kless

10/16/2008 9:51:00 PM

0

A great use of JRuby would be to access to libraries that in Ruby
would be too slow. I speak about programs related with a great
computational cost as audio, image, video, crypto., etc.

Of course that it isn't necessary to use JRuby for all your code. You
could have a class in JRuby that access to Java and the rest of your
code in Ruby.