[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Re: Tk questions

Kenneth McDonald

9/2/2008 2:20:00 AM

Thanks. In English terms, 'context' isn't quite the right word for
that, and I would never have guessed
it referred to an event spec (with which I am familiar).

One off-topic question; anyone know how to specify an event sequence
that would indicate_all_
events? Would <> do it? Will have to try...

Thanks again,
Ken


On Sep 1, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Hidetoshi NAGAI wrote:

> From: Kenneth McDonald <kenneth.m.mcdonald@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Tk questions
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 03:17:17 +0900
> Message-ID: <6B17C0CD-3C3B-40B1-A30B-733671C9F603@sbcglobal.net>
>> In "bind_remove_all" (and many other commands), what is the required
>> 'context' argument supposed to be.
>
> Please give an event sequence (see also Tcl/Tk's "bind" manual).
>
> Tcl/Tk ==> Ruby/Tk
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> an event pattern <mod-mod-type-detail> "mod-mod-type-detail"
> an event sequence <pat><pat>...<pat> ["pat", "pat", ... ,
> "pat"]
> a virtual event <<virtualName>> "<virturalName>"
>
> --
> Hidetoshi NAGAI (nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp)
>
8 Answers

Hidetoshi NAGAI

9/2/2008 3:29:00 AM

0

From: Kenneth McDonald <kenneth.m.mcdonald@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Tk questions
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:20:29 +0900
Message-ID: <9960590A-444A-4DBC-A2D1-8F58F843DFFB@sbcglobal.net>
> Thanks. In English terms, 'context' isn't quite the right word for

I think so too. :-)
That was used before my first contact with Ruby.

> One off-topic question; anyone know how to specify an event sequence
> that would indicate_all_
> events? Would <> do it? Will have to try...

I'm very sorry, but I cannot understand what you want to do.
--
Hidetoshi NAGAI (nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp)

P. Rajah

2/20/2010 12:59:00 AM

0

CB wrote:

> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> news:hln3ap02vle@news5.newsguy.com...
>> Jay Stevens Maharaj aka the jumpin' jackass jyotishit wrote:
>>
>>> Obama's Approval Decline
>> You hate Obama because you had predicted Hillary would be the Dem
>> candidate, so once again you were proven to be worthless with your "no
>> experimentation here!" b.s. jyotishit asstrollogy. Get over it, Jay, he
>> won!
>
> And his chickens have come home to roost.
>
> Now they're slowly roasting by the fire he's stoked with his BLT

That doesn't make Jay Stevens' b.s. "prediction" any more accurate, does
it? When people cannot see beyond their own blind rage, what they have
to say has no value.

CB@PrayForMe.com

2/20/2010 1:14:00 AM

0


"P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:hlnc4l013m7@news6.newsguy.com...
> CB wrote:
>
>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>> news:hln3ap02vle@news5.newsguy.com...
>>> Jay Stevens Maharaj aka the jumpin' jackass jyotishit wrote:
>>>
>>>> Obama's Approval Decline
>>> You hate Obama because you had predicted Hillary would be the Dem
>>> candidate, so once again you were proven to be worthless with your "no
>>> experimentation here!" b.s. jyotishit asstrollogy. Get over it, Jay, he
>>> won!
>>
>> And his chickens have come home to roost.
>>
>> Now they're slowly roasting by the fire he's stoked with his BLT
>
> That doesn't make Jay Stevens' b.s. "prediction" any more accurate, does
> it? When people cannot see beyond their own blind rage, what they have to
> say has no value.

Does it look as if Obama has a look of rage in this pic?

http://www.usofearth.com/2011-obamas-coup...


P. Rajah

2/20/2010 1:57:00 PM

0

CB wrote:

> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> news:hlnc4l013m7@news6.newsguy.com...
>> CB wrote:
>>
>>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hln3ap02vle@news5.newsguy.com...
>>>> Jay Stevens Maharaj aka the jumpin' jackass jyotishit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Obama's Approval Decline
>>>> You hate Obama because you had predicted Hillary would be the Dem
>>>> candidate, so once again you were proven to be worthless with your "no
>>>> experimentation here!" b.s. jyotishit asstrollogy. Get over it, Jay, he
>>>> won!
>>> And his chickens have come home to roost.
>>>
>>> Now they're slowly roasting by the fire he's stoked with his BLT
>> That doesn't make Jay Stevens' b.s. "prediction" any more accurate, does
>> it? When people cannot see beyond their own blind rage, what they have to
>> say has no value.
>
> Does it look as if Obama has a look of rage in this pic?
>
> http://www.usofearth.com/2011-obamas-coup...

And what does this have to do with an asstrolloger's prediction that
Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination? Extremists on both
sides have a predilection for creating their own reality.

CB@PrayForMe.com

2/20/2010 3:52:00 PM

0


"P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:hlopoa031v@news2.newsguy.com...
> CB wrote:
>
>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>> news:hlnc4l013m7@news6.newsguy.com...
>>> CB wrote:
>>>
>>>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:hln3ap02vle@news5.newsguy.com...
>>>>> Jay Stevens Maharaj aka the jumpin' jackass jyotishit wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Obama's Approval Decline
>>>>> You hate Obama because you had predicted Hillary would be the Dem
>>>>> candidate, so once again you were proven to be worthless with your "no
>>>>> experimentation here!" b.s. jyotishit asstrollogy. Get over it, Jay,
>>>>> he won!
>>>> And his chickens have come home to roost.
>>>>
>>>> Now they're slowly roasting by the fire he's stoked with his BLT
>>> That doesn't make Jay Stevens' b.s. "prediction" any more accurate, does
>>> it? When people cannot see beyond their own blind rage, what they have
>>> to say has no value.
>>
>> Does it look as if Obama has a look of rage in this pic?
>>
>> http://www.usofearth.com/2011-obamas-coup...
>
> And what does this have to do with an asstrolloger's prediction that
> Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination? Extremists on both
> sides have a predilection for creating their own reality.

What's the man whose chickens have come home to roost's, reality? Obama's
narcissistic academic theory that spending money on 'trickle up economics'
will benefit the country as a whole is a lie. The reality 'is', spending
will benefit him politically in purchasing votes from low achievers.

The reality is cutting taxes benefits us all, from top too bottom.

But then Obama only knows academic theory, as with his staff.

RichTravsky

2/21/2010 5:58:00 AM

0

CB wrote:
> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> > CB wrote:
> >> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> >>> CB wrote:
> >>>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> >>>>> Jay Stevens Maharaj aka the jumpin' jackass jyotishit wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Obama's Approval Decline
> >>>>> You hate Obama because you had predicted Hillary would be the Dem
> >>>>> candidate, so once again you were proven to be worthless with your "no
> >>>>> experimentation here!" b.s. jyotishit asstrollogy. Get over it, Jay,
> >>>>> he won!
> >>>> And his chickens have come home to roost.
> >>>>
> >>>> Now they're slowly roasting by the fire he's stoked with his BLT
> >>> That doesn't make Jay Stevens' b.s. "prediction" any more accurate, does
> >>> it? When people cannot see beyond their own blind rage, what they have
> >>> to say has no value.
> >>
> >> Does it look as if Obama has a look of rage in this pic?
> >>
> >> http://www.usofearth.com/2011-obamas-coup...
> >
> > And what does this have to do with an asstrolloger's prediction that
> > Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination? Extremists on both
> > sides have a predilection for creating their own reality.
>
> What's the man whose chickens have come home to roost's, reality? Obama's
> narcissistic academic theory that spending money on 'trickle up economics'
> will benefit the country as a whole is a lie. The reality 'is', spending
> will benefit him politically in purchasing votes from low achievers.
>
> The reality is cutting taxes benefits us all, from top too bottom.

Ah, the fialed theory of "a rising tide lifts all boats"...

> But then Obama only knows academic theory, as with his staff.

CB@PrayForMe.com

2/21/2010 1:30:00 PM

0


"RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4B80CB5C.2DA7CFE4@hotmMOVEail.com...
> CB wrote:
>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>> > CB wrote:
>> >> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>> >>> CB wrote:
>> >>>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>> Jay Stevens Maharaj aka the jumpin' jackass jyotishit wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Obama's Approval Decline
>> >>>>> You hate Obama because you had predicted Hillary would be the Dem
>> >>>>> candidate, so once again you were proven to be worthless with your
>> >>>>> "no
>> >>>>> experimentation here!" b.s. jyotishit asstrollogy. Get over it,
>> >>>>> Jay,
>> >>>>> he won!
>> >>>> And his chickens have come home to roost.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Now they're slowly roasting by the fire he's stoked with his BLT
>> >>> That doesn't make Jay Stevens' b.s. "prediction" any more accurate,
>> >>> does
>> >>> it? When people cannot see beyond their own blind rage, what they
>> >>> have
>> >>> to say has no value.
>> >>
>> >> Does it look as if Obama has a look of rage in this pic?
>> >>
>> >> http://www.usofearth.com/2011-obamas-coup...
>> >
>> > And what does this have to do with an asstrolloger's prediction that
>> > Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination? Extremists on both
>> > sides have a predilection for creating their own reality.
>>
>> What's the man whose chickens have come home to roost's, reality? Obama's
>> narcissistic academic theory that spending money on 'trickle up
>> economics'
>> will benefit the country as a whole is a lie. The reality 'is', spending
>> will benefit him politically in purchasing votes from low achievers.
>>
>> The reality is cutting taxes benefits us all, from top too bottom.
>
> Ah, the fialed theory of "a rising tide lifts all boats"...

Lowering taxes has worked to increase economic activity EVERY TIME in
American history, unfortunately greedy politicians just can't help to spend
the resulting increase to the treasury.

But then Obama only knows academic theory, as with his staff.


RichTravsky

2/24/2010 6:03:00 AM

0

CB wrote:
> "RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> > CB wrote:
> >> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> >> > CB wrote:
> >> >> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> >> >>> CB wrote:
> >> >>>> "P. Rajah" <user@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> >> >>>>> Jay Stevens Maharaj aka the jumpin' jackass jyotishit wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Obama's Approval Decline
> >> >>>>> You hate Obama because you had predicted Hillary would be the Dem
> >> >>>>> candidate, so once again you were proven to be worthless with your
> >> >>>>> "no
> >> >>>>> experimentation here!" b.s. jyotishit asstrollogy. Get over it,
> >> >>>>> Jay,
> >> >>>>> he won!
> >> >>>> And his chickens have come home to roost.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Now they're slowly roasting by the fire he's stoked with his BLT
> >> >>> That doesn't make Jay Stevens' b.s. "prediction" any more accurate,
> >> >>> does
> >> >>> it? When people cannot see beyond their own blind rage, what they
> >> >>> have
> >> >>> to say has no value.
> >> >>
> >> >> Does it look as if Obama has a look of rage in this pic?
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.usofearth.com/2011-obamas-coup...
> >> >
> >> > And what does this have to do with an asstrolloger's prediction that
> >> > Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination? Extremists on both
> >> > sides have a predilection for creating their own reality.
> >>
> >> What's the man whose chickens have come home to roost's, reality? Obama's
> >> narcissistic academic theory that spending money on 'trickle up
> >> economics'
> >> will benefit the country as a whole is a lie. The reality 'is', spending
> >> will benefit him politically in purchasing votes from low achievers.
> >>
> >> The reality is cutting taxes benefits us all, from top too bottom.
> >
> > Ah, the fialed theory of "a rising tide lifts all boats"...
>
> Lowering taxes has worked to increase economic activity EVERY TIME in
> American history, unfortunately greedy politicians just can't help to spend
> the resulting increase to the treasury.
>
> But then Obama only knows academic theory, as with his staff.

Since it's republicons who believe this myth, they're the spendthrifts.

LOL