David Hartung
10/21/2011 10:08:00 AM
On 10/20/2011 11:57 PM, 6280 Dead, 1423 since 1/20/09 wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:30:24 -0400, Vandar wrote:
>
>> 6280 Dead, 1423 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:54:48 -0400, Vandar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> 6280 Dead, 1423 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:28:13 -0400, Vandar<vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> wy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 3:32 pm, Vandar<vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 6280 Dead, 1423 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:06:15 -0700 (PDT), wy<w...@myself.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 12:20 pm, David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/20/2011 10:50 AM, 6280 Dead, 1423 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:43:39 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What troubles me about this issue is that NATO and the USA
>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem to have developed a policy ov intervening in internal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fights. Libya has never been a threat to NATO, and yet NATO
>>>>>>>>>>>>> found it necessary to enter the fight.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, Libya supported the Pan-Am bomber, but as I recall, he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was caught, and imprisoned for his crime. Was our intervention
>>>>>>>>>>>>> truly called for?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, what DO you think of this notion that western nations
>>>>>>>>>>>> have the right to overthrow and kill foreign leaders of whom
>>>>>>>>>>>> they don't approve?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To what, specifically, are you referring?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Something to keep in mind if the Canadian government is
>>>>>>>>>>>> compelled to arrest George W. Bush on war crime charges.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Which will not happen. For Canada to do such, would constitute,
>>>>>>>>>>> in my opinion, an act of war.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bush is a private citizen not worth going to war over. Get real
>>>>>>>>>> some day, will you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good luck getting the US population to chant "Free George or
>>>>>>>>> Fight!"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think quite a few Americans would consider the arrest justified.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And the people that matter would consider it a violation of US law.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the law and how does it trump Canadian law? Your laws begin
>>>>>>> and end at your borders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I guess your Canadian laws don't apply to the actions of a US
>>>>>> citizen regarding Iraq. Canada has no jurisdiction.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada by treaty is a signator to international law, which DOES have
>>>>> jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> Not over Americans, it doesn't.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it does. Oh, don't worry; they can't come in American territory
>>> and snatch war criminals off the streets. But they can arrest and try
>>> Americans who stray into nations that honor their treaties.
>>
>> Not according to US law, they can't. But it's irrelevant, the Canadian
>> government has already such talk is meaningless. Besides, Bush is
>> already there. Already gave his speech. He's probably headed home by
>> now.
>> It's over. Done. Does not apply.
>
> Bubbles, try to understand: US law doesn't apply in Canada. It's a
> different country.
>
> Now, personally, I'm sorry Canada didn't arrest his murderous ass, but I
> knew that Harper and his government are pretty deficient, so I didn't
> have high hopes.
>
> But know this: America is regarded as a rogue nation by much of the
> civilized world.
Then you are more than welcome to leave.
IN the fifteen years I have been in and out of this forum, you have done
nothing but denigrate the country in which you live, a country in which
you are not a citizen. Why on earth do you stay? If we are so very bad,
why haven't you left?