Attila <
2/2/2010 8:32:00 PM
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:26:11 GMT, x <x@y.com> in alt.abortion with
message-id <nZT9n.5201$pv.1651@news-server.bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>Attila < wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:39:31 GMT, x <x@y.com> in alt.abortion with
>> message-id <70O9n.5088$pv.3187@news-server.bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Attila < wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:15:02 GMT, x <x@y.com> in alt.abortion with
>>>> message-id <WfJ9n.5041$pv.3381@news-server.bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Uncle Vic wrote:
>>>>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, "J" <Jvisions@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scott Roeder has made the ultimate sacrifice in his quest to stop the
>>>>>>> killing of pre-born children. I personally do not approve of killing
>>>>>>> for any reason, and certainly not by some vigilante. Dr. Tiller should
>>>>>>> have been sentenced to life in prison after his first act of
>>>>>>> infanticide, just as Scott Roeder should be sentenced now for
>>>>>>> murdering 'Tiller the Baby Killer'.
>>>>>> Tiller was no good guy in my eyes. He did perform a few late-term
>>>>>> abortions, which I believe are illegal depending on the circumstances. But
>>>>>> the case here is plain. You don't go taking the law into your own hands.
>>>>> Never? What about:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. George Washington and the other American revolutionaries.
>>>> His side won so he is a hero.
>>> Tiller's killer won the battle between him and Tiller.
>>
>> That was individual strife, where the rules are a bit different.
>>
>>>
>>>>> 2. von Stauffenberg (who tried to illegally kill Hitler, and stared in
>>>>> Valkyrie, the movie).
>>>> And was killed for his effort.
>>> So?
>>>
>>>>> 3. Nelson Mandela (who led an illegal bombing campaign in the 1960s).
>>>> He eventually won so he is a hero.
>>> Hero? You are importing notions of instrinsic value.
>>
>> As are you when you use him as a positive example of someone taking
>> the law into their own hands.
>
>I'm allowed to.
Allowed by who?
> I'm not the one who denied its existence
The existence of what?
>by writing
>"Right and wrong have no intrinsic values". You are.
>
>>>
>>>>> The USA is built on the premise that illegal acts are justified when
>>>>> necessary to prevent wrongs.
>>>> No, it is not.
>>>>
>>>> History always makes the winners heroes and losers villains
>>>>
>>>> Right and wrong have no intrinsic values and will change from person
>>>> to person and over time.
>>> They have intrinsic value/disvalue by definition.
>>
>> Whose definition?
>
>Anyone's as long as it's correct.
Who decides if it is correct?
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification, not work permit or citizenship.
Support H.R. 1940: Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007
Any organizations with any of the following words or phrases in their name should
be avoided at all costs:
Catholic Anything
Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum
Decency
Family - Other than Family Planing
"Faith Based" Anything
Justice Institute
Liberty
Life
Moral
Parents Television Council
United for Life
Values
Michael Vick should be stripped naked and put in a pit
with at least a dozen of his dogs.