Fred J. McCall
11/19/2008 1:28:00 PM
Yeah Rightie <yeahrighty@left.centre.right> wrote:
:On alt.talk.royalty, Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:38:24 -0700, Re:
:Controlled Demolition brought down WTC7 - not little fires in the
:centre...[was Re: Remembering the Noble War Dead, Fred J. McCall
:<fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
:
:>Yeah Rightie <yeahrighty@left.centre.right> wrote:
:>
:>:On alt.talk.royalty, Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:46:43 -0000, Re:
:>:Controlled Demolition brought down WTC7 - not little fires in the
:>:centre...[was Re: Remembering the Noble War Dead, "Westprog"
:>:<westprog@hottmail.com> wrote:
:>:
:>:>Yeah Rightie wrote:
:>:>> On alt.talk.royalty, Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:14:09 -0700, Re:
:>:>> Controlled Demolition brought down WTC7 - not little fires in the
:>:>> centre...[was Re: Remembering the Noble War Dead, Fred J. McCall
:>:>> <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
:>:>>
:>:>>> Michael O'Neill <onq@bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote:
:>:>>>>
:>:>>>> Watch the total collapse of WTC7 allegedly caused by several small
:>:>>>> fire at its centre.
:>:>>>>
:>:>>>> Its obvious, not horseradish to conclude that this occured solely
:>:>>>> via controlled demolition.
:>:>>>>
:>:>>>
:>:>>> Yeah. All it takes to arrive at your conclusion that it was
:>:>>> destroyed by controlled demolition is a massive dose of ignorance
:>:>>> coupled with a few hits off a crack pipe...
:>:>>
:>:>> Why are you so desperate to shut down his posts?
:>:>> Everyone has a right to post and many will post opinions contrary
:>:>> to ours.
:>:>
:>:>Because it's a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying
:>:>nothing.
:>:>
:>:>> It's a mark of maturity to let people post and defend their right
:>:>> no matter how contrary their beliefs are to ours.
:>:>
:>:>It's a sign of common sense to ignore lunatic jabberings, since there is far
:>:>more bad information out there than it would ever be possible to sift
:>:>through.
:>:>
:>:>Anybody can post anything on usenet. Nobody reads everything. We all make
:>:>choices, and pointing out the rubbish to help other people inform their
:>:>selections isn't censorship, it's being helpful.
:>:
:>:In your opinion, not in mine.
:>:I would prefer to get a lot of extraneous noise than have a
:>:controlled and censored forum, which is what this will turn out
:>:to be if you scare everyone away.
:>:
:>
:>In other words, you want to censor anyone disagreeing with the loons.
:>
:>Good luck with that...
:
:How you can get the absolute opposite meaning from my post
:explains a lot about your method of reasoning.
:
Well, we're sort of constrained to the actual words you use and how
you assemble them. We can't read your mind. Your transmitter is far
too weak.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn