Yoorghis
3/20/2011 3:12:00 AM
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:45:03 -1000, "Jerry Okamura"
<okamuraj005@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>Obama should be applauded for letting the Europeans deal with Libya
>rather than speeding a boatload of US money on an intervention.
>
>
>Why? Here are the reasons given why Bush should not have gone to war with
>Iraq, by those on the left. Iraq did not attack the United States, Libya
>did not attack the United States. Another reason given was Iraq was not a
>threat to the United States, Libya is definitely not a threat to the United
>States. Bush went to war with Iraq partly for humanitarian reasons, which
>some on the left criticized him for. Libya is primarily for humanitarian
>reasons. Bush waged an "illegal war". If Bush waged an "illegal war", then
>Obama is waging an "illegal war". Bush's war killed "innocent civilians".
>Obama's war is killing "innocent civilians". Need I continue?
a) Bush lied and withheld, NEW intel that proved Saddam was not a
threat
b) NONE of bush's claims were true by mid February 2003
c) Bush started a war based on LIES, "UNILATERALLY" without being
sanctioned by the UN.
d) there is nothing you listed comparable to bush's disaster in Iraq
>=============================================================
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT), Kurtis T. Nicklas of
1293 Westbrook Ave, Elon, NC 27244-9372"
<nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>I don't pay much attention to him these days, but I'd wager he's not
>happy.
You sure as shit paid attention when you got caught
making all those late-night hang-up phone calls, didn't
ya, Nickkkkers?
CLICK ! ! !