[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

About Editors

kittu T.

5/13/2008 10:04:00 AM


Hi, I have been working on C# from the past two and half years and as a
ruby enthusiast i would like to dig in to it to the extent possible for
me....as of know just a newbie and interested in knowing the best editor
to work with Ruby..
is it Netbeans? or Rad Rails? or may be some other editor...can any one
of you people please suggest me the best editor to work with....

thanks in advance!
kittu.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....
2 Answers

Casimir

5/13/2008 10:36:00 AM

0

The best editor is the one you like and know best. This is a *lovely*
question and I personally ask myself this q at least once a year.

I used to like netbeans (but it was slow and bulky, many years ago).
I used to like textpad (and still might but am trying to stay on linux).

Vim is excellent and has excellent code completion for ruby and other
(ruby) plugins, and can be configured to do anything you like, but
requires weeks of learning and modifying for most.

Kate is excellent editor, is very easy to start using and has nice code
completion, but is only available for KDE. Great for ruby.

JEdit is excellent cross platform code-tool, but isnt quite as fast and
stable as vim in my experience. Very nice plugins. Waiting for the pre
to hit stable version.

Scite is lightweight and clean and has code completion and ruby
compilation built in.

All free as in open source.

YMMV.

---Casimir Pohjanraito

kittu T. kirjoitti:
> Hi, I have been working on C# from the past two and half years and as a
> ruby enthusiast i would like to dig in to it to the extent possible for
> me....as of know just a newbie and interested in knowing the best editor
> to work with Ruby..
> is it Netbeans? or Rad Rails? or may be some other editor...can any one
> of you people please suggest me the best editor to work with....
>
> thanks in advance!
> kittu.

Seon

2/16/2011 7:21:00 PM

0



"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:tqcnl6lp8ag9nqeueoaapav8kdl12h925h@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:14:46 +1100, "Seon" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:2mrml6ptkrqo2k0kefd18fupoi9inq689e@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:42:26 +1100, "Seon" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:g6okl6lrubelrf81qg4nh5u42s36t0hvfn@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:21:41 +1100, "Seon" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Spartan613" <nospam@buggeroff.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:Znp6p.10500$gM3.6213@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>>> "Seon" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:ij2iho$3if$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Spartan613" <nospam@buggeroff.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:cPN4p.10019$MF5.844@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>>>>> "Seon" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:ij07il$g4h$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Spartan613" <nospam@buggeroff.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:pIL4p.10009$MF5.7537@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> "Seon" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:iiutlr$ccr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ugt5l65cal2d1f51ob95eqdbnsmcidp8i2@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:11:18 +1100, "Seon" <seongf@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:bqd4l61am05g2a7f8kn519kc18sr5vpeh6@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:49:36 +1000, "Sunny"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <wombathouse.@yahoo.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Seon" <seongf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:iis98h$jvh$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "regn.pickford" <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:4d517bb0$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What a disrespectful jack ass. What's worse is the die
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbott
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lovers will probably defend him. When will the liberals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with brains their leader?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.news.com.au/national/s-happens-tony-abbott-to-troops-after-lance-corporal-jared-mackinneys-death/story-e6frfkvr-122...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should the Widow's and the grieving family wishes be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considered?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [qs]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "As far as we, Jared's family, are concerned there is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the matter is over, and we will be making no further
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [qf]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you have difficulty understanding or care about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not about what they think, it's about what Tony
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abbotts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead soldiers is and how he reacted when questioned by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reporter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I served in the Army for 37 years, and if I had been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"questioned"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>same manner, by that reporter, I would have smacked him in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>gutter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mouth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You have swallowed the media spin hook line and sinker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope it's you lot who have been swallowed by the liberal party
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>spin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Reporters have every right to ask politicians the tough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>questions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>they don't like it they should quit politics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I haven't heard any "liberal party spin" to be able to swallow
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I read the article *you* posted and watched the video
>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a media beat up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even the ALP says it's a media beat up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So reporters shouldn't dare ask politicians hard questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And what "hard question" are you referring to?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Edited bullshit media clips don't qualify as questions.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What pisses me off about it, to use your analogy.... Soldiers
>>>>>>>>>>> fight
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> provide freedom of the press, only to see it abused by cockheads
>>>>>>>>>>> looking to make a name for themselves, or revenue for the
>>>>>>>>>>> network.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't abuse, the reporters people told Abbott's people he
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> asked about this. And even if you deem it to be an abuse, it's
>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>> freedom of the press.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Freedom of the press to selectively edit footage to score cheap
>>>>>>>>> propaganda points is freedom we can do without.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's something novel for the media to try..... reporting the
>>>>>>>>> facts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which they did. They reported Tony Abbott said shit happens and
>>>>>>>> asked
>>>>>>>> him
>>>>>>>> about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bullshit. If that were the case, we wouldn't be talking about it
>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The footage was selectively edited and didn't represent what Abbott
>>>>>>> experienced on the day in question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Was his reaction when he was questioned by the reporter who warned
>>>>>>Abbott's
>>>>>>people that he would question Abbott hours ago "selectively edited" as
>>>>>>well?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you watch the Media Watch footage? All of it? Did you not see that
>>>>> Abbott
>>>>> *answered* the reporter's question. Did you not see that the reporter
>>>>> then
>>>>> re-asked the question and this caused the "reaction" you have such a
>>>>> boner
>>>>> about?
>>>>>
>>>>Did the reporter air the whole footage? Now I want to know if it was the
>>>>reporter who snipped the footage or some other network.
>>>
>>>
>>> Did you watch the Media Watch footage? All of it?
>>>
>>Yes and while seven did show how biased and useless it is by suggesting
>>Abbott insulted the soldier who died
>
> So you now no longer believe him to be "a disrespectful jack ass", and you
> are
> embarrassed to have written "Abbott happens...(I mean shit)"?
>
> Good.
>
Nope he was still at fault but I am starting to see how biased seven is.