James Britt
3/26/2008 8:46:00 PM
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Why git instead of mercurial?"
> on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:47:06 +0900, James Britt <james.britt@gmail.com> writes:
>
> |Interesting. I know a number of Ruby people using darcs or hg, but no
> |one using git. I'm wondering if it's a Railsville thing, not a Rubyland
> |thing
>
> I personally use git (actually stgit) on my machine, then push/pull
> changes to the central subversion repository.
>
I'm curious: When there was a move away from CVS, why didn't the ruby
source tree go to git, instead of svn?
--
James Britt
"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is
not worth knowing."
- A. Perlis