On Friday, February 7, 2014 10:05:18 PM UTC-5, Gerry wrote:
> On 2014-02-08 01:33:52 +0000, TD said:
>
>
>
> > On Friday, February 7, 2014 7:55:50 PM UTC-5, Gerry wrote:
>
> >> On 2014-02-07 23:58:16 +0000, TD said:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>> On Friday, February 7, 2014 6:53:54 PM UTC-5, Gerry wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>> On 2014-02-07 22:55:34 +0000, TD said:
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>> I noticed that you did not mention that Billy or anyone had ghosted for
>
> >>>>> Quincy in '74/75. In other words, it is possible that you may have
>
> >>>>> said, "Well, I know that Billy had ghosted for Quincy...
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> Yeah, but I didn't know he had. Billy's never told me a damn thing,
>
> >>>> probably because I don't know him.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> Stay well!
>
> >>
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >>> You posted only part of the quote, but staying well I shall!!
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> I only quoted the part I was responding to. I didn't have any thing to
>
> >> add regarding Ann-Margaret...
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >>
>
> >> Those who wish to sing always find a song. -- Swedish proverb
>
> >
>
> > And I was **not** referring to Ann-Margret. I referred to the "anyone"
>
> > factor. The fact that you did not mention that "anyone" ever ghosted
>
> > for Quincy. Just that.
>
>
>
> I don't know that he did. That's why I didn't say he did.
>
>
>
> > You made it like I meant only and specifically Billy.
>
>
>
> I didn't make it sound like anything. The rest of this week's tantrum
>
> you'll have to do as a solo.
>
>
>
> > I said "Billy or anyone." No, obviously you never knew Billy. But, you
>
> > seemed to be unaware that anyone (I did say Billy or anyone)ever did
>
> > the ghosting. Now that I look back at what you quoted, you **did** have
>
> > "anyone" in the quote, yet you only responded to the Billy part,
>
> > because your response is more apropos to your statement: "Yeah, but I
>
> > didn't know he had. Billy's never told me a damn thing, probably
>
> > because I don't know him."
>
> >
>
> > Now Quincy may very well have had ghost writers as far back, at least
>
> > to the '60s. I also doubt the '50s, because of different type of work
>
> > loads, but I was not privy to it. Maybe, Thom was. And then again,
>
> > maybe Thom got his decades confused. We still do not know.
>
> >
>
> > The main thing is, ghosting was always around and still is. The fact
>
> > that you did not hear any change of style in Quincy's work no matter
>
> > what decade is inconsequential. Why? Because no one was meant to. The
>
> > best hires the best and sometimes better.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Those who wish to sing always find a song. -- Swedish proverb
Deep.