James Britt
3/14/2008 7:12:00 PM
7stud -- wrote:
> James Britt wrote:
>> 7stud -- wrote:
>>> You will have to get used to the fact that the Ruby docs are horrible.
>>
>> Patches welcome.
>>
>>
>
> Open up the docs to user comments, and then they will be self
> documenting. See the php model.
Is that what stops you from contributing to the docs? Or would you
prefer that others make the contributions, while you simply declare them
to be horrible?
There are some people who have taken the time to create and/or improve
the docs. You can bitch about their efforts, but a tangible
contribution would be so much more durable.
(I apologize if you have been sending in doc patches.)
ruby-doc.org is currently running with Nitro; I'm inclined to port it to
Ramaze.
If anyone is interested in helping me assemble a Ramaze-based means of
allowing doc comments, with decent spam blocking, drop me a line. (I
prefer to use Og or Sequel for the ORM, but open to informed suggestions
otherwise.)
Note that the API doc content would still need to be auto-generated from
the svn ruby source and doing so should not interfere with any existing
comments.
--
James Britt
"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly
universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by
uncertainty cannot be the truth."
- R. Feynman