casa
1/17/2008 10:57:00 PM
Le 17 janv. 08 =E0 23:24, Joel VanderWerf a =E9crit :
> Michel Casabianca wrote:
>> NOTE: please don't try to convince me that I don"t need validation!
>
> I wouldn't think of it. XML, now, that's something you don't need. ;-)
Well done ;o)
Now, do you know a replacement for structured document format? YAML is =20=
great, but I can't figure how to use it for that purpose... RDoc is =20
great for README files, but it ends with hugly HTML tags for more =20
complex documents. SGML is great also, but writing a DTD is far too =20
complex. LaTeX is great too, but I can't parse it. That's why I'm =20
stuck with XML and need validation.
--
Michel Casabianca
michel.casabianca@gmail.com