[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

[HighLine] stty: stdin isn't a terminal

fedzor

12/24/2007 3:46:00 AM

Hey

I'm in the middle of writing shell as a part of Rubyunix, I am using
HighLine::SystemExtensions to get each character (so that I may check
to see if it is a reserved keystroke).

Basically, here's my error:
http://pastie.caboo...

I absolutely cannot figure this out. In all of the other times that
I've used this piece of code and tested it out, it has never done
this to me before.

To clarify what is happening, it is thorwing the 'stty: stdin isn't a
terminal' AFTER it processes the command and is redisplaying the prompt.

If there's anything else you need me to disclose, please tell me.

Thanks,
-------------------------------------------------------|
~ Ari
seydar: it's like a crazy love triangle of Kernel commands and C code
10 Answers

James Gray

12/24/2007 6:00:00 AM

0

On Dec 23, 2007, at 9:46 PM, thefed wrote:

> I'm in the middle of writing shell as a part of Rubyunix, I am using
> HighLine::SystemExtensions to get each character (so that I may
> check to see if it is a reserved keystroke).
>
> Basically, here's my error:
> http://pastie.caboo...

I can't seem to see this paste at the moment. :/

> I absolutely cannot figure this out. In all of the other times that
> I've used this piece of code and tested it out, it has never done
> this to me before.
>
> To clarify what is happening, it is thorwing the 'stty: stdin isn't
> a terminal' AFTER it processes the command and is redisplaying the
> prompt.
>
> If there's anything else you need me to disclose, please tell me.

Do you have the termios gem installed?

That's the preferred method for HighLine to handle these issues. Can
you try installing it and see if it helps?

James Edward Gray II

rst9

11/27/2013 4:17:00 AM

0

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:07:11 PM UTC-8, wakal...@yahoo.com.sg wrote:
> That sounds like the millenial dream of China haters. They can dream on. The rocks at sea that the Chinese and Japanese claim are not worth the life of a single American. I can imagine Obama sorrowfully telling the parents and spouses of Americans killed in action, "Your sons and daughters died defending the most precious rocks on the far side of the Pacific Ocean..."

It didn't stop Johnson from sending over half a million American soldiers to fight in Vietnam.

Or George "Worthless" Bush from his "Shock and Awe" in Iraq.

Now Obama thinks China is still living in the Qing Dynasty!!!

Wakalukong

11/27/2013 4:48:00 AM

0

Don't be too sure about trading American lives in exchange for some rocks on the wrong side of the Pacific. Honoring American lives takes precedent over some rocks. Not only are the rocks not worth a single Americam life, they're not even worth a dip in the president's rating.

Wakalukong

Baboe Belanda

11/27/2013 5:40:00 AM

0

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:47:43 -0800 (PST), wakalukong@yahoo.com.sg
wrote:

>Don't be too sure about trading American lives in exchange for some rocks on the wrong side of the Pacific. Honoring American lives takes precedent over some rocks.
>Not only are the rocks not worth a single Americam life, they're not even worth a dip in the president's rating.
>
>Wakalukong

I still believe it is a matter of principle. Do you know how many
Americans have lost their lives during previous world wars? Do you
know how many Americans have died in Afghanistan and Iraq? And more
will die...
___________________________________
"Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your
pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn
and tear you in pieces." Matthew 7:6

Wakalukong

11/27/2013 10:34:00 AM

0

None died for pieces of rock.

In the 2nd Iraq war(the one prosecuted by HW Bush), none died for any principle. In fact, they all died for a lie (the non-existent WMD).

Wakalukong

Baboe Belanda

11/27/2013 3:46:00 PM

0

On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:33:59 -0800 (PST), wakalukong@yahoo.com.sg
wrote:

>None died for pieces of rock.
>
>In the 2nd Iraq war(the one prosecuted by HW Bush), none died for any principle. In fact, they all died for a lie (the non-existent WMD).

Did you read that they all have been moved to Syria overnight? That's
why Syria has tons of WMD...

http://www.policymic.com/articles/62103/how-did-syria-get-chemical-weapons-did-they-come-from-our-old-fri...

>
>Wakalukong
___________________________________
"Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your
pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn
and tear you in pieces." Matthew 7:6

rst0wxyz

11/27/2013 4:13:00 PM

0

On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 2:33:59 AM UTC-8, wakal...@yahoo.com.sg wrote:
> None died for pieces of rock.
> In the 2nd Iraq war(the one prosecuted by HW Bush), none died for any principle. In fact, they all died for a lie (the non-existent WMD).

The second Iraq War was George "Worthless" Bush.
The first Iraq War was "George Herbert Walker Bush".

Baboe Belanda

11/27/2013 4:16:00 PM

0

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:07:11 -0800 (PST), wakalukong@yahoo.com.sg
wrote:

>That sounds like the millenial dream of China haters. They can dream on. The rocks at sea that the Chinese and Japanese claim are not worth the life of a single American.

You only see the rocks, a very narrow vision like Yale Guen Mar. He
only sees girlfriends and vibrators....ROTFL.

>I can imagine Obama sorrowfully telling the parents and spouses of Americans killed in action, "Your sons and daughters died defending the most precious rocks on the far side of the Pacific Ocean..."
>
>Wakalukong
___________________________________
"Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your
pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn
and tear you in pieces." Matthew 7:6

Wakalukong

11/28/2013 1:24:00 AM

0

You got the news that the non-existent WMD were moved to Syria from Frankie Lee?

And how much honor can politicians spin out of those rocks?

Some months back, an American analyst called Japan America's North Korea, that is, an ally that causes trouble (like North Korea causing trouble for China). He concluded by saying Japan could defend itself and America should not be sucked into a war with China.

Of course, things will be different if oil is found in the islands' vicinity. Then honor will be thrown to the winds, and losing thousands of American lives for some bullshit "national security interest" will be most honorable.

Wakalukong

Wakalukong

11/28/2013 1:25:00 AM

0

Thanks for the correction. Apologies to the father.

Wakalukong