suzeeq
2/20/2014 4:03:00 PM
Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>> It's painful to read the quotes. Painful. You've inserted quoted blank
>>>>>>> lines where there should be none; I've never seen three quoted blank lines
>>>>>>> within the grouping of attribution lines after I cleaned up your horrid
>>>>>>> quotes in the last several followups. I'm not in the mood to clean this
>>>>>>> one up, so I'm leaving the ugly mess you created. I don't know why yours
>>>>>>> are worse than everyone else's, and given that I've noticed that you DON'T
>>>>>>> cut .sigfiles from quotes (which are NEVER to be quoted in
>> followup) please
>>>>>>> don't tell me how fastidious you are about formatting.
>>>>>> HE doesn't insert the blank lines, google does. I've seen it in other
>>>>>> posts through google.
>>>>> Stay out of it, suzeeq. Get your own flame war and don't pour gasoline
>>>>> on this one. You're just causing trouble.
>>>> Oh, are you starting another flame war...?
>>> You appear to want me to. That's why you're pouring the gasoline.
>>> You're causing trouble.
>>>
>>>>> He is responsible for what and how he posts, same as you are, same
>>>>> as anyone else is.
>>>> He said it looks okay when he views it. It's still google's fault.
>>> I read what he wrote; an echo from you is unnecessary. You're wrong.
>>>
>>> Also, you misread what he wrote. He also stated that he reformats the
>>> quoted paragraph that he follows up to, so no, it DOESN'T look correct
>>> when he views it.
>>>
>>> He's been told numerous times about Google Groups' mal-formatting. He
>>> knows it's wrong, yet he still posts this way. It's his fault.
>>>
>>> He also has the nerve to lecture others about standards compliance in
>>> an improperly formatted followup article.
>> You always tell people what and how they post too. We let you get by
>> with it.
>
> Welcome to unmoderated Usenet. Nevertheless, you must enjoy it, as you
> chose to revive and continue a discussion that had ended.
It's not over until the last post is made.
>
>>> Lastly, he posts to a tv newsgroup insisting that he has a Ph.D.
>
>> So what? A phD doesn't preclude tv watching. That's the weakest argument
>> you make.
>
> Genuine people don't do that.
Really.