James Gray
12/8/2007 2:46:00 AM
On Dec 7, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: at_exit() Inherited Across fork()"
> on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 05:33:41 +0900, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net
> > writes:
>
> |I'm not saying this is wrong, just clarifying what I am seeing. Is
> it
> |intended that at_exit() handlers are inherited by a fork()ed process?
>
> Yes. Is it a problem?
Not really. I think I understand why it is.
It just seems a little counter intuitive that at_exit() does anything
outside of the current process. I'm having a hard time imagining when
I would want it to.
Thanks for confirming though.
James Edward Gray II