Daniel Berger
11/8/2007 3:14:00 AM
On Nov 7, 6:01 pm, "Alexey Verkhovsky" <alexey.verkhov...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2007 11:07 AM, Daniel Berger <djber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Still no CVS support? That's a shame.
>
> CVS is legacy tech by now. I have yet to see an actual Ruby project
> using CVS (although I've heard of such things). All TW Ruby projects
> are using Subversion, which is why we don't have any other source
> control option in the core.
You must be joking. Look no further than RubyForge or SourceForge.
Heck, even Ruby itself was using CVS until last year or so.
> In fact, speaking of other source control options, we had noticeably
> more requests to support Mercurial and git, than CVS. There are 3rd
> party plugins for both.
And there are none for CVS?
Please reconsider CVS!
Regards,
Dan