[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Ruby 3D

user@domain.invalid

10/19/2007 9:12:00 PM

Hi, I know the answer but I try anyway : is there a well supported Ruby
binding to a good 3D engine ?

What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2 years)
and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D

It's quite strange : why a such good language does have nothing serious
when dealing with 3D ? Many interpreted languages does...


Anything I would have missed ?


Thanks !
4 Answers

Aria Stewart

10/19/2007 9:37:00 PM

0


On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Zouplaz wrote:

> Hi, I know the answer but I try anyway : is there a well supported
> Ruby binding to a good 3D engine ?
>
> What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2
> years) and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D
>
> It's quite strange : why a such good language does have nothing
> serious when dealing with 3D ? Many interpreted languages does...
>
>
> Anything I would have missed ?
>

Ruby's threading model makes some of the techniques used problematic.

Phlip

10/19/2007 9:44:00 PM

0

Zouplaz wrote:

> What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2 years)
> and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D

Is that this?

http://www.shattere...

--
Phlip
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780...
^ assert_xpath

Bill Kelly

10/19/2007 11:23:00 PM

0


From: "Zouplaz" <user@domain.invalid>
>
> Hi, I know the answer but I try anyway : is there a well supported Ruby
> binding to a good 3D engine ?
>
> What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2 years)
> and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D
>
> It's quite strange : why a such good language does have nothing serious
> when dealing with 3D ? Many interpreted languages does...

An updated Ogre3D binding was announced just last month:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-t...


Hope this helps,

Bill

trotsky

7/27/2013 12:20:00 PM

0

On 7/26/13 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>> On 7/26/13 3:37 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/13 10:11 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/26/13 12:53 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/25/13 6:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> Can a mistrial be declared after the verdict has been given?
>
>>>>>>>>> No, Hutt.
>
>>>>>>>> Do you know shit about anything?
>
>>>>>>>> http://nashua.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/mistrial-declared-weeks-after-guil...
>
>>>>>>> Oh, gud gawd. You're an idiot, trots.
>
>>>>>> Apparently I have to speak to you guys like children. I think you're in
>>>>>> your sixties, Kermie, and you have a mental age of 12.
>
>>>>> You're an idiot, trots.
>
>>>> Didn't think you'd be man enough to admit what you did wrong. Thanks
>>>> for playing, though.
>
>>> I was wrong for expecting you
>
>> No, you were wrong period. I already went over this four times. Ask
>> someone to help you if you're having trouble.
>
> How does repeating your tangential news analysis make anything you wrote
> applicable to Zimmerman?


It doesn't. I asked a general question, which is still visible in this
post. You're still having trouble. I asked you to get help if you're
still having trouble. Now you're having trouble understanding that
you're still having trouble. I'm pretty sure that English is you're
first language, and that you're general malaise is caused by being
fucked in the head. Get help.


--
Never post something on the internet unless you have a point of
reference. You will look like a moron otherwise.