[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

A Must Read!!!

richard.james861@gmail.com

10/3/2007 9:25:00 AM

I have found an excellent resource on Object Oriented Programming.


http://technical-talk.com/SoftDev/OOP/OOP...

8 Answers

Bertram Scharpf

10/3/2007 11:51:00 AM

0

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 03. Okt 2007, 18:30:03 +0900 schrieb richard.james861@gmail.com:
> I have found an excellent resource on Object Oriented Programming.
>
> http://technical-talk.com/SoftDev/OOP/OOP...
^^^
An authority on smart software design.

Bertram


--
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-...

Michael T. Richter

10/3/2007 12:54:00 PM

0

On Wed, 2007-03-10 at 20:50 +0900, Bertram Scharpf wrote:

> > I have found an excellent resource on Object Oriented Programming.



> > http://technical-talk.com/SoftDev/OOP/OOP...

^^^

> An authority on smart software design.


Now, now! Be nice! :)

Me, I'm just still amazed at people who act as of OOP was something new
and exciting. It's been around since the '60s and reached heavy use (in
one form or another) starting almost 20 years ago. (I have similar
questions about people acting as if functional programming -- '50s --
were the New Deal.)

--
Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter@gmail.com> (GoogleTalk:
ttmrichter@gmail.com)
Our outrage at China notwithstanding, we should remember that before
1891 the copyrights of foreigners were not protected in the United
States. (Lawrence Lessig)

Michael Glaesemann

10/3/2007 1:04:00 PM

0


On Oct 3, 2007, at 7:53 , Michael T. Richter wrote:

> (I have similar questions about people acting as if functional
> programming -- '50s -- were the New Deal.)

Huh. I haven't seen many people claiming Roosevelt had much influence
on computer science.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net


Phillip Gawlowski

10/3/2007 2:18:00 PM

0



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:grzm@seespotcode.net]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2007 14:04
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: A Must Read!!!
>
>
> On Oct 3, 2007, at 7:53 , Michael T. Richter wrote:
>
> > (I have similar questions about people acting as if functional
> > programming -- '50s -- were the New Deal.)
>
> Huh. I haven't seen many people claiming Roosevelt had much influence
> on computer science.

"Since 1933, politicians and pundits have often called for a "new deal"
regarding an object. That is, they demand a completely new, large-scale
approach to a project."

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Dea...

Clear as mud?

--
Phillip Gawlowski


M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

10/3/2007 3:08:00 PM

0

Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Oct 3, 2007, at 7:53 , Michael T. Richter wrote:
>
>> (I have similar questions about people acting as if functional
>> programming -- '50s -- were the New Deal.)
>
> Huh. I haven't seen many people claiming Roosevelt had much influence on
> computer science.
>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>
>

Well ... he did fund the Manhattan Project, after all. Most of the
calculations for that, however, were done by rooms full of men and women
operating mechanical desk calculators, under the direction of John Von
Neumann and others. These men and women were known as "computers", and
in many cases had college degrees in mathematics.

The genius of Von Neumann was that he saw that such calculations could
be done faster, more accurately and with lower cost electronically. But
it didn't happen until *after* the Manhattan Project was over and FDR
was in his grave.

John Joyce

10/3/2007 3:29:00 PM

0


On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:08 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 2007, at 7:53 , Michael T. Richter wrote:
>>> (I have similar questions about people acting as if functional
>>> programming -- '50s -- were the New Deal.)
>> Huh. I haven't seen many people claiming Roosevelt had much
>> influence on computer science.
>> Michael Glaesemann
>> grzm seespotcode net
>
> Well ... he did fund the Manhattan Project, after all. Most of the
> calculations for that, however, were done by rooms full of men and
> women operating mechanical desk calculators, under the direction of
> John Von Neumann and others. These men and women were known as
> "computers", and in many cases had college degrees in mathematics.
>
> The genius of Von Neumann was that he saw that such calculations
> could be done faster, more accurately and with lower cost
> electronically. But it didn't happen until *after* the Manhattan
> Project was over and FDR was in his grave.
>
Slide Rule

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

10/4/2007 4:37:00 AM

0

John Joyce wrote:
>
> On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:08 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>
>> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>>> On Oct 3, 2007, at 7:53 , Michael T. Richter wrote:
>>>> (I have similar questions about people acting as if functional
>>>> programming -- '50s -- were the New Deal.)
>>> Huh. I haven't seen many people claiming Roosevelt had much influence
>>> on computer science.
>>> Michael Glaesemann
>>> grzm seespotcode net
>>
>> Well ... he did fund the Manhattan Project, after all. Most of the
>> calculations for that, however, were done by rooms full of men and
>> women operating mechanical desk calculators, under the direction of
>> John Von Neumann and others. These men and women were known as
>> "computers", and in many cases had college degrees in mathematics.
>>
>> The genius of Von Neumann was that he saw that such calculations could
>> be done faster, more accurately and with lower cost electronically.
>> But it didn't happen until *after* the Manhattan Project was over and
>> FDR was in his grave.
>>
> Slide Rule
>
>
Uh ... try integrating PDEs with a room full of people running slide
rules some time. :)

The electronic equivalent of the slide rule, the analog computer, was
limited to a precision of at best five decimal digits, and could
integrate *ordinary* differential equations easily. But partial
differential equations are a whole 'nutha ball game. :)

John Joyce

10/4/2007 5:09:00 AM

0


On Oct 3, 2007, at 11:37 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

> John Joyce wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:08 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>>> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>>>> On Oct 3, 2007, at 7:53 , Michael T. Richter wrote:
>>>>> (I have similar questions about people acting as if functional
>>>>> programming -- '50s -- were the New Deal.)
>>>> Huh. I haven't seen many people claiming Roosevelt had much
>>>> influence on computer science.
>>>> Michael Glaesemann
>>>> grzm seespotcode net
>>>
>>> Well ... he did fund the Manhattan Project, after all. Most of
>>> the calculations for that, however, were done by rooms full of
>>> men and women operating mechanical desk calculators, under the
>>> direction of John Von Neumann and others. These men and women
>>> were known as "computers", and in many cases had college degrees
>>> in mathematics.
>>>
>>> The genius of Von Neumann was that he saw that such calculations
>>> could be done faster, more accurately and with lower cost
>>> electronically. But it didn't happen until *after* the Manhattan
>>> Project was over and FDR was in his grave.
>>>
>> Slide Rule
> Uh ... try integrating PDEs with a room full of people running
> slide rules some time. :)
>
> The electronic equivalent of the slide rule, the analog computer,
> was limited to a precision of at best five decimal digits, and
> could integrate *ordinary* differential equations easily. But
> partial differential equations are a whole 'nutha ball game. :)
>
Put a lot of stuff in space though!
And pioneered through the RF and amplifier circuits. (think vacuum
tubes/ valves, now that's some hardcore engineering!)