Sheldon Cooper
1/28/2011 3:30:00 PM
On Jan 27, 9:07 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:38:18 -0800 (PST), Sheldon Cooper
>
> <richarddead...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >What do you think the Civil Rights Act of 1965 was?
>
> A FEDERAL LAW
So, Wilson, Truman and FDR COULD have ended Jim Crow..., they just
didn't want to. Hell, they didn't even condemn the laws - because
they agreed with them.
> >> A federal law act passed AFTER:
>
> >> a) the liberal wing of the DNC introduced it
>
> >> b) the Integration of Military
>
> >> c) the Brown v board decision
>
> >> d) the national electorate FINALLY not tolerating CONSERVATIVES
> >And why didn't Truman introduce it twenty years earlier? Or FDR
> >thirty years earlier. Or Wilson fifty years earlier?
>
> Brown v Board wasn't passed until 1954---during Eisenhowers term
> At that time, SOUTHERN CONSERVATIVE "Jim Crow laws" were being
> dismantled.
Since Jim Crow laws were enbraced and encouraged (and bested) by the
three leading leftists in 20th Century America, that leads to the
musical question "what makes Jim Crow laws conservative?" How much
more leftist can one get thatn Woodrow Wilson, FDR and Harry Truman?
Planned Paeenthood? OK, they've very leftist - ooops, Myra pushed
eugenics and racial engineering.
> Is there something you can't understand about the time periods in all
> this?
Since you asked - why does a 1954 lawsuit wipe FDR's slate clean for
his 1942 rounding up of all the Japanese-American citizens, seizing
their property, and sending them to work camps? Would George Taki,
upon hearing about the decision say "Oh, my - never mind about being
kidnapped by federal officals and spending my childhood in a
workcamp. Debt paid - in - full?"
Why does a court hearing forty years after the fact undo the Wilson's
Palmer raids? Or his support of the KKK?
> STATE LAW engendered Jim Crow and segregation
And why didn't Wilson, FDR, and Truman condemn those laws? Oh,
right, BECAUSE BLACKS VOTED REPUBLCIAN AT THE TIME, AND DOING THE
RIGHT THING WOULD HAVE THREATENED THEIR BASE.
> State law enforced "tests" for voting (for blacks)
And why didn't Wilson, FDR, and Truman condemn those laws? Oh,
right, BECAUSE BLACKS VOTED REPUBLCIAN AT THE TIME, AND DOING THE
RIGHT THING WOULD HAVE THREATENED THEIR BASE.
> State law segregated races
And why didn't Wilson, FDR, and Truman condemn those laws? Oh,
right, BECAUSE BLACKS VOTED REPUBLCIAN AT THE TIME, AND DOING THE
RIGHT THING WOULD HAVE THREATENED THEIR BASE.
> From 1954-1965 (11 yrs)---the transition from Conservative abuses in
> the south to the Civil rights act---was set up by Brown v Board---and
> the eventual civil rights act of 1965
(snicker) Do you have the GALL to tell me that Wilson, FDR, and Truman
WOULDN'T have proposed an Equal Right Amendment without winning a
lawsuit?
> Which enraged SOUTHERN CONSERVATIVES so that they left the Democratic
> party and became republicans
Except that they didn't. 18 of the 20 Dixiecrats remained Democrats
for the rest of their political, and natural, lives.
Sorry, it's a nice day dream - but that's all. The Democrats have a
long, ugly, racist history - which some day you're going to have to
come to terms with.
> That's why your GOP leadership all have a southern drawl.
When Warren G. Harding ran for president, your grandparents spread
rumors that he was one quarter black. They handed out leflets with a
picture of the White House and the caption "Uncle Tom's New Cabin."